I was disappointed to see that Alex Smith felt compelled to change the subject matter and trot out the old tired and thoroughly debunked myth that Brady and the Patriots benefitted by playing in the AFC East.
First off, that is totally irrelevant to the discussion; secondly it is simply not true. With the exception of 2007 (when the division was a collective eight games under .500 - thanks mostly to the 1-15 Dolphins), the AFC East as a whole usually had a winning record. The Pats record outside the division and outside the conference were quite similar over the years. Typically the NFC West and AFC South were the underachievers.
Tom Brady and Alex Smith have opposing views on the current state of the NFL, with Brady believing it's mediocre and Smith believing it's better than ever.
awfulannouncing.com
And then, my biggest complaint with this, and no offense to you guys (Randy Moss and Tedy Bruschi), he played in the most uncompetitive division, I think, in NFL history.”
“I mean, you come out of training camp in the biggest cupcake division, you got a ticket to the playoffs right away,” said Smith. “Like, talk about mediocre.”
Thankfully others chose to look up the facts - that completely disprove Alex Smith's
hot lukewarm take.
As pointed out by Robert Harding on X, in eight of those years, the AFC East had at least one other playoff team.
Why Alex Smith is so butthurt and full of salty tears is a mystery to me.
AFC East cumulative records through the years:
2001: 21-19 (3 playoff teams)
2002: 23-17 (no teams w/a losing record)(NFCN & NFCW: only 1 winning team each; NFCN 14 games under .500)
2003: 24-16 (10-6 Miami misses playoffs on a tiebreaker; AFCE has best record among the 8 divisions)
2004: 25-15 (3 teams w/winning record; AFCE has 2nd best record, 1 win behind AFCN; NFC has just 4 winning teams)
2005: 16-24 (Miami is 2nd at 9-7; in NFCW the Rams, Cardinals and SF went a combined 15-33)
2006: 23-17 (2 playoff teams; best division record again; in NFC 3 teams make playoffs w/ record of 9-7 or 8-8)
2007: 16-24 (NFCS has worst division; Bucs finish 1st at 9-7, and division as a whole is 10 games under .500)
2008: 26-14 (3 teams w/winning records, tied for best division; NFCW is the worst at a combined 20 games under .500)
2009: 20-20 (2 playoff teams; NFC West is again the worst, with an abysmal 12-28 record outside their division)
2010: 24-16 (2 playoff teams; tied w/NFCS for best division)
2011: 21-19 (AFCE has nobody below 6-10; AFCS is 12 under, best team in NFCE is 9-7 and best in AFCW is 8-8)
2012: 19-21 (AFC West is the league's worst division with only one winning record, finishing 12 games below .500)
2013: 22-18 (Only 1 team in AFCE has a losing record (6-10); NFCN has nobody w/more than eight wins)
2014: 21-19 (Again only one AFCE team has a losing record; Colts win AFCS as their division goes 14 under .500)
2015: 24-16 (2 playoff teams, best division in NFL; NFC East is the worst, 12 games under .500)
2016: 24-16 (2 playoff teams; AFCN (11 games under .500) and AFCS (nobody better than 9-7) are at the bottom)
2017: 21-19 (2 playoff teams; AFC South brings up the rear again, ten under .500)
2018: 16-24 (The AFC East is last, two games behind the NFC West; ironically the Pats and Rams meet in the Super Bowl)
2019: 22-18 (2 playoff teams; the NFC East is the league's worst division, a whopping 16 games below .500)
Post-Brady Years:
2020: 20-20 (Two 10+ win teams; Washington wins the NFC East (17 under .500) with a 7-win season)
2021: 22-22 (2 playoff teams, 3 w/winning record; AFC South goes 12 games under .500)
2022: 25-18 (2 playoff teams, nobody worse than 7-10; AFCS goes a pitiful 20 under .500; 8-9 Bucs win NFCS)
Perhaps Alex Smith should do a bit of research before he feels the need to make his opinion known next time. I used to think much more highly of him.