- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,984
- Reaction score
- 14,474
You guys are analyzing the semantics of this waaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyy to much.
There is no difference between a coach of the Bills, with the Bills, from the Bills, or whatever.
"Hi, I'm with the Bills."
"Oh, are you a player?"
"No, I'm a coach."
"You're a coach of the Bills?"
"Yep, sure am."
Incorrect. The above conversation has no sportswriter or editor in it.
"So was he the head coach of the bills?"
"No, that's why I said 'a member of the Bills' coaching staff."
"But that makes him a coach of the Bills? Right?"
"Okay two things..."
"No TWO THINGS!!! ONE THING!!! EYES ON PAGES!!!"
"Okay I can't say his team, PROMISED!"
"Does this guy even exist?"
"Yeah he exists he gets the guys towels every WEEK!"
"Doens't matter right, no name, can't name the team..."
"He DOES..."
"Who CARES!!!! How about "a coach of another AFCE team..." "
"But that makes it sound like..."
"EYES ON PAGES TARDO! EYES ON PAGES!"
Now then, the editor can be external early on, but is much more likely to reside in the writer's own head when he's faced this conundrum repeatedly.
My understanding is the first time is the hardest one.
PFnV