Analysis like that is good to read. Patriots fans and rational people will read it and think it makes sense. Then you read the comments and see there's a vocal group out their who have their fingers in their ears, denying this stuff.
My favorite was the "Even if it doesn't help, it's still cheating" argument. Given the choice between (a) no cheating and (b) cheating, but in a non-beneficial way that isn't supported or revealed by the analysis, these people choose to believe that invisible and ineffective forces are at work. There's not much you can do when the counter-argument to "See? No evidence" is that lack of evidence supports their claim of wrongdoing.
