upstater1
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 26,496
- Reaction score
- 16,715
and nothing else. STOP THE NOISE. Learn something from the political campaigns: target messaging. ONE THING. Not many things.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...best-recollection-on-a-key-piece-of-evidence/
Right in the Wells Report, they cooked the findings to signal tampering, when the testimony of the referee who took the measurements would have lead to the conclusion there was no tampering. Let me bold the pertinent conclusion for you guys again:
"In other words, Anderson recalls using the gauge before the game that, based on the halftime measurements, leads to a finding of no tampering."
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...best-recollection-on-a-key-piece-of-evidence/
Page 52 of the Wells report reveals that it was Anderson’s “best recollection” that he used before the game the gauge with the logo and the longer, crooked needle. In other words, Anderson recalls using the gauge before the game that, based on the halftime measurements, leads to a finding of no tampering.
So how did Ted Wells get around the “best recollection” of Walt Anderson? Wells persuaded Anderson to admit that it’s “certainly possible” he used the other gauge. And the company hired to provide technical support for the Wells report concluded based on a convoluted explanation appearing at pages 116-17 of the report that it is “more probable than not” that Anderson used the other gauge.
In other words, the Wells report concludes on this critical point that it’s “more probable than not” that Anderson’s “best recollection” was wrong.
Why should Anderson’s “best recollection” be doubted? He knew that there was a concern about tampering with the footballs. He presumably was paying more careful attention to the process of getting the balls filled with air before the AFC title game than he normally does.
Right in the Wells Report, they cooked the findings to signal tampering, when the testimony of the referee who took the measurements would have lead to the conclusion there was no tampering. Let me bold the pertinent conclusion for you guys again:
"In other words, Anderson recalls using the gauge before the game that, based on the halftime measurements, leads to a finding of no tampering."