SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.A great read! Thanks for that!
He felt if we talked to NBA executives, who had been using one since 1984, about the nuisances of working with a cap, it might help us manage our own.
The mistake we made was trusting outside sources. From that day on, trusting outside sources would never happen again in a Belichick draft room.
If you go into an evaluation with a predetermined prejudice of a player -- good or bad -- then you will collect data to support your already determined theory. This does not happen in New England.
The Patriots have the No. 7 pick, and because of the amount of guaranteed money required to sign that particular player, this could greatly affect his team's salary structure. He will care about Tom Brady and the impact the signing would have on Brady's mind. And as we see from reading the comments of many unhappy veterans this year, how teams allocate cap dollars directly affects the locker room.
From the Butterfly-Flapping-Its-Wings-In-Panama-Starts-A-Hurricane-Over-The-Atlantic theory of how small/obscure influences can dramatically change history comes the fact (assuming Lombardi is correct) that Belichick fell prey to bad info about Warren Sapp and passed him in the draft. All Pats fans owe that anonymous source of misinformation a thank you because if BB had taken Sapp in that draft it's fairly certain his tenure in Cleveland would have gone better and who knows how that would have distorted BB's career trajectory. Somehow I doubt we would have ended up with him - as it was it cost a mint in picks to get him. weird...