I didn't say it was the *best* case. I just meant that it was *a* valid case.
Think about it for a moment: a lot of people talk about the fact that there's no way Welker would catch 112 passes without Moss there to draw away coverage. While I won't argue that point, I would also argue that Moss might not have his 23 TDs if Welker weren't there to draw coverage away from Moss. (Remember--on the go-ahead TD against the Giants, Moss was open because the Giants had sold out to stop Welker from picking up the first down.) Combine that with his ability to block DBs and smaller LBs, and I can understand why someone voted for him (even though, I admit, I wouldn't have myself). Oh, one other thing--Welker caught
77% of the passes thrown in his direction. That, in and of itself, is almost unheard of, and a good number of the ones he didn't catch were uncatchable anyways.