TinhWoodhead
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 4,633
- Reaction score
- 5,000
Skip B. j/kWhat voters have you seen on TV or elsewhere indicating Brady is their choice?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Skip B. j/kWhat voters have you seen on TV or elsewhere indicating Brady is their choice?
Exactly.Was checking the stats earlier looking at the pass/run splits inside the 5. Some examples:
Packers - 66/34
Falcons - 45/55
Patriots - 32/68
stat padding twat
The disqualifier for Ryan?
9 games in a dome vs zero for TB.
That NEVER gets the play it should. It's a massive advantage.
Was checking the stats earlier looking at the pass/run splits inside the 5. Some examples:
Packers - 66/34
Falcons - 45/55
Patriots - 32/68
stat padding twat
So you were annoyed when BB left brady in the 4th Q in 2007 when we were blowing teams out 52-0 etc etc ? I dont get the fascination of this stat of throwing inside the 5 or 10 yard line. Should you be more classy and not throw the ball in the 5 just so that the other team gets a better chance to stop you ? Why dont we just tell the other team we are running the ball inside the 5 ? I personally never had a problem when manning supposedly did it or when rodgers or anyone does it. In BB's words -"The job of the offense is to put the ball in the endzone, running/throwing whatever".Was checking the stats earlier looking at the pass/run splits inside the 5. Some examples:
Packers - 66/34
Falcons - 45/55
Patriots - 32/68
stat padding twat
They have a WR converted RB. When your best chance to score is your QB and a mobile QB in that, you putting the ball in his hands is not a bad or unclassy move.That confirms what I thought I had been seeing. I know it's petty, but it annoys me to see Rodgers throw the ball three straight times inside the ten and then hear everyone praise him for his number of TD passes.
I think it's a good thing we run the ball so much on the goal line. A happy Blount is a productive Blount.
I guess we can disagree but the colts/manning movie was more nauseating."sheriff", "offensive coordinator on the field" etc etc were just too much.I get that Goodell probably screwed over Brady on the MVP, although the official voters tend to put a lot of weight on winning and securing a top seed, so I'm not convinced he is out. I think it will be a very close race. However, can someone please explain to me a single logical argument that Aaron Rodgers should win the award over Matt Ryan? Where exactly does he have an advantage? Ryan faced similar issues with a lackluster defense, played a tougher schedule, won more games, and was better statistically by a landslide. If Rodgers wins the MVP, it's due to another Midwest loud screaming campaign, similar to the Peyton Manning years, where it's basically a PR campaign based around some new MVP theme, this time being a dumb catch phrase. Remarkable that Rodgers "ran the table!!!" Well, Brady won his last seven games, not his last six. Many 10-6 teams don't even qualify for the playoffs. This is just like Manning, and I'm already seeing Green Bay writers with their "he's deserving of it" talk while minimizing that other players are MORE deserving. I've seen this movie with the Colts and Manning enough times to know how it ends...
Was checking the stats earlier looking at the pass/run splits inside the 5. Some examples:
Packers - 66/34
Falcons - 45/55
Patriots - 32/68
stat padding twat
The 2006 Patriots went 12-4 and that team had a lot less offensive talent than this year's Packers team. Brady's leading receiver was Caldwell.I guess we can disagree but the colts/manning movie was more nauseating."sheriff", "offensive coordinator on the field" etc etc were just too much.
The "Run the table" is something he said which the media ran with it. ITs annoying the same way other team fans find "Do your job" or "Patriot way" terms annoying . GB defense is downright terrible. But rodgers run in the last few weeks has coincided with their defense playing better just as brady has benefitted with a much better defense after the seattle game. Thats why these awards in a team game are something i never understood. Regarding rodgers himself, a lot of people where calling him fading when their team was fading but 40 TD's and 7 INT's is not fading. That is really not a very good GB team in terms of weapons or coaching. This is all him , just like 2006 brady.
But the Falcons would be nothing without Ryan. Had a better season than Rodgers in all the stat departments except for TDs.The bottom line is that Rodgers, Ryan, and Brady are all deserving which makes the conversation so much fun.
I believe the reality though will have the award going to Rodgers. There is an annual debate over what the MVP award really means. One side says it should go the player with the best stats on a playoff team. The other debate goes with the literal "Most Valuable" to the team (in which a player could lose points for being on a stacked team).
IN this case, I think Rogers meats both criteria.........he has the best stats and is the most valuable to the team. Green Bray would be nothing without Rogers. Brady has Belichick to blame for this, but the Pats were 3-1 without Brady which certainly hurts his case.
The bottom line is that Rodgers, Ryan, and Brady are all deserving which makes the conversation so much fun.
I believe the reality though will have the award going to Rodgers. There is an annual debate over what the MVP award really means. One side says it should go the player with the best stats on a playoff team. The other debate goes with the literal "Most Valuable" to the team (in which a player could lose points for being on a stacked team).
IN this case, I think Rogers meats both criteria.........he has the best stats and is the most valuable to the team. Green Bray would be nothing without Rogers. Brady has Belichick to blame for this, but the Pats were 3-1 without Brady which certainly hurts his case.
They have a WR converted RB. When your best chance to score is your QB and a mobile QB in that, you putting the ball in his hands is not a bad or unclassy move.