Palm Beach Pats Fan
Pro Bowl Player
2019 Weekly Picks Winner
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
- Messages
- 10,626
- Reaction score
- 20,363
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.That is a good question.
I'll tell you what. If an En Banc hearing is granted Roger's head is going to explode. Hell, my head might explode.
That was the next question asked but Ted Olden didn't know the answer, he was very impressive on the show, he made the whole case easy to understand. Goody suspended TB for being generally aware, he knew that wouldn't fly so he upheld his decision based on TB not turning over his phone and concocting a scheme. You can't change the reason for the suspension at arbitration, you either uphold on the original reason or change it based on any new info related to that reason. Kessler should have hammered this point home and kept the hearing on track. If TB had TO at the CA2 hearing it would have been a different outcome.Interesting one now has to wonder how many of his desents went En Banc.
Guaranteed it's more than 3. And they can all go F themselves.It's probably more than that but Irsay's tripping his sox off and is unable to count ATM.
That was the next question asked but Ted Olden didn't know the answer, he was very impressive on the show, he made the whole case easy to understand. Goody suspended TB for being generally aware, he knew that wouldn't fly so he upheld his decision based on TB not turning over his phone and concocting a scheme. You can't change the reason for the suspension at arbitration, you either uphold on the original reason or change it based on any new info related to that reason. Kesller should have hammered this point home and kept the hearing on track. If TB had TO at the CA2 hearing it would have been a different outcome.
I'm sure you think Deflategate was handled properly after a fair and balanced investigation too.
Guess which 3....
Guess which 3....
Can you try that again in English this time???Besides yourself, do you think anyone gives a crap is Kraft needs to show YOU more?
Was more about the consistency of the calls. Bs hold on Tre Jackson took away a huge catch.There was a hold that looked identical to that on the last second Brady pass to Thompson against the Saints in 2013. It went uncalled as well. Saints fans bit.ched about it but we sure didn't care.
Owners aren't coming up with this. They're mouthpieces for the League. They want to remain anonymous so they won't look like schmucks shilling for Goebbels Goodell's talking points. All that Park Avenue cares about is image and PR, so why wouldn't they think that's what BK's motivation is. Ergo, get some shills out fast to do some sniper damage.
It's a forum to discuss anything Patriots related. He expressed an opinion about the owner of the team. Someone responded positively, so it's safe to assume that someone gave a ****.
So it's only a conspiracy when you say it is. Ok.Come on, don't be stupid.
Thinking a game where our team had a 14 point 4th quarter lead WASN'T rigged and the sham stupidity of Deflategate is a completely separate matter.
And I'm sure you think little green men crashed at Area 51, JFK was an inside job and the moon landing was faked too...
Well he can if he wants to...I wonder if Goodell would have the balls to try to suspend Kraft for his actions and claim that it violates the NFL Constitution, sort of a conduct detrimental...integrity and all...... Then he could appoint a "receiver/trustee" from the league office to run the team.....I'm only half joking but I can see Goodell acting vindictively (overcompensating for his small........)...That would set off a sh*tstorm of epic proportions....
Article 9.1(C)(4) of the Constitution & Bylaws states that no team may “[p]ublicly criticize any member club or its management, personnel, employees, or coaches and/or any football official employed by the league.” The provision then requires that “[a]ll complaints or criticism in respect to the foregoing shall be made to the Commissioner only and shall not be publicized directly or indirectly.”
So it's only a conspiracy when you say it is. Ok.
Well he can if he wants to...
Can you try that again in English this time???
Sure......given you're too stupid to understand it as is
Besides yourself, do you think anyone gives a crap that Kraft needs to show YOU more?
Thanks for the ad hominum attack. Try reading your original sentence aloud, it makes no sense... As for my comment ( which was liked by 5 people- so I guess you tell me) it was reflective of me as an individual fan giving my opinion of how his actions have not been consistent in support of his franchise quarterback, vacillating between supporting Brady and the Commissioner. Kraft doesn't have to show me anything but if he wants the fans support, he needs to be consistent.....Sure......given you're too stupid to understand it as is
Besides yourself, do you think anyone gives a crap that Kraft needs to show YOU more?