- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,092
- Reaction score
- 22,705
Just Ian acting like fnord, everything is a joke.
Ban Ian! Oh, wait!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Just Ian acting like fnord, everything is a joke.
I think you mean would "of", could "of", should "of"...
Not "persay," per se.
I hate to correct people on their English, because I'm sure I butcher it here and there. But that one really gets me. I see it quite a bit, but usually let it go. I was about to correct this one before I read your post.Not "would of," would HAVE.
They would have won or lost.
It's a doggy dog world out there.
2008 - 11-5 but missing the playoffs should be a crime against humanity.Here is how I see every year.
2000 - No. Rebuilding.
2001 - In retrospect they had a very good team and by the end of the year deserved to be in the top 5 ranked. A clear over achievement though.
2002 - Talent wasn't there injuries aside.
2003 - Took care of business. Did what they should have.
2004 - Same as above. Clearly the best team that year.
2005 - They were the best team but a 3peat is hard to ask for
2006 - Not good enough on O. Too bad cause if they got past the Colts it be an easy win and were still one of the best teams
2007 - Should have won.
2008 - lost year
2009 - rebuild
2010 - rebuild but a very good team.
2011 - a very good team but not the clear top. Right up their with a few
2012 - Same as 2011
2013 - Same as 2012
2014 - The best team and they won
2015 - The best team and bad luck with injuries.
2016 - TBD
I saw what you did there.I'm just saying that its silly to dwell on you're past. There certainly the type of team to be chomping at the bit once they're anger is peaked.
I woulda donnit to cause I pride meselph on ma gramma and "punctiation', but, whatevah, no, big woop.I hate to correct people on their English, because I'm sure I butcher it here and there. But that one really gets me. I see it quite a bit, but usually let it go. I was about to correct this one before I read your post.
Always trying to help the little people.I woulda donnit to cause I pride meselph on ma gramma and "punctiation', but, whatevah, no, big woop.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda, or would've, could've, should've.
I despair to think that in 50 years, "I would of told him" might be acceptable grammar.
Not "would of," would HAVE.
They would have won or lost.
Agree with pretty much everything except 2005, no way they were the best team that yearHere is how I see every year.
2000 - No. Rebuilding.
2001 - In retrospect they had a very good team and by the end of the year deserved to be in the top 5 ranked. A clear over achievement though.
2002 - Talent wasn't there injuries aside.
2003 - Took care of business. Did what they should have.
2004 - Same as above. Clearly the best team that year.
2005 - They were the best team but a 3peat is hard to ask for
2006 - Not good enough on O. Too bad cause if they got past the Colts it be an easy win and were still one of the best teams
2007 - Should have won.
2008 - lost year
2009 - rebuild
2010 - rebuild but a very good team.
2011 - a very good team but not the clear top. Right up their with a few
2012 - Same as 2011
2013 - Same as 2012
2014 - The best team and they won
2015 - The best team and bad luck with injuries.
2016 - TBD
People still treat internet message boards like a legal document with the grammar policing huh?
There should be a comma after the word 'policing'.
What a sad world we live in lol
L-o-l* ?"What a sad world we live in. LOL."