- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,335
- Reaction score
- 105,301
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He just need to be a power runner, LB is not given his sizeThe question is...is that quicker/faster than Blount. I don't think so but not 100% sure.
I'm in the camp that the line hasn't been doing a great job of run blocking this year...
I know. I read a few posters who have been on Blount and I don't think it's all him.I don't think that's a "camp", I think it's pretty much a fact
#39 just happens to be available. It's like it was meant to be.
#39 just happens to be available. It's like it was meant to be.
He's lost 3-4 steps. I absolutely love SJax, but he looked *rough* the last few times i saw him. I'm not sure he's better than Bolden right now but i'd absolutely give him a shot.
I think he is already better than Bolden.
The team doesn't even need a serious impact from Jackson. All he needs to do is provide enough production to keep defenses somewhat honest and respect play action every now and then.
Should have been reitred after Woodhead honestly. God I miss that ****erIt wasn't retired after Maroney?
....and played pretty well for them. What was he like in his late 40s?Kind of like when the Bruins traded for the ancient Jacques Plante.
Kind of like when the Bruins traded for the ancient Jacques Plante.
....and played pretty well for them. What was he like in his late 40s?