Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/...-conference/xDh95sukwpCGH9DQMDELCK/story.html is, on the surface, a competent article summarizing the issues in the lawsuit.
But it doesn't give a hint of what is really the central issue, namely, what does it mean to abide by the CBA? In particular, is there a binding "law of the shop" separate from the plain text of the CBA?
But it doesn't give a hint of what is really the central issue, namely, what does it mean to abide by the CBA? In particular, is there a binding "law of the shop" separate from the plain text of the CBA?
- Kessler's brief cites a whole lot of precedent for thinking there is.
- Pash's brief cites a whole lot of precedents for thinking there isn't, most of which I imagine were considered and rejected as arguments against some of the precedents Kessler cites.