IllegalContact
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2010
- Messages
- 31,809
- Reaction score
- 16,273
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think where Wells may have messed up is he said that he only stated "more probable than not" that Brady was guilty because that was the League standard, but he really thinks Brady is guilty.
The League has that standard to protect themselves against lawsuits. That is why they didn't want Wells to say he is guilty in that report. Now that Wells said that he only used that phrase because that was what the League wanted, it may give Brady and his camp more ammo.
Now this I disagree with. Read the comments on any of these national articles (I CANNOT BELIEVE I AM ACTUALLY SUGGESTING THIS) and people legitimately think in their actual hearts and souls that brady and belichick are cheaters.
They didnt read the report, they barely even listened to the talking heads. They just were spoonfed guilty and thats that. My own brother who is smart and an independent thinker has been texting me that he is so surprised Brady was into all that etc etc... literally everyone in my ENTIRE workplace from the uneducated up to all the physicians think that they are guilty (I live away from the NE)...
Thats is the saddest part of this. unless there is an internal whistleblower from the NFL, a mind-blowing leak, or the NFL gets so thoroughly embarrassed by a neutral arbitrator such as a court so as to retract the Wells report or something - Brady is forever guilty in most peoples eyes.
maybe we are seeing through our pats fans eyes..people elsewhere e.g reddit think wells nailed in the presser and no way even an independent arbitrator reduces the suspension.
Anyone who dares mock me over the Patriots situation is a recipient of my unholy verbal wrath and must sit while I lecture them for half an hour on all the massive holes in the Wells report. 2 people have challenged me thus far at work, and those people ran out of things to say while I was only halfway done. (I also live away from NE - I'm in Pennsylvania.)Now this I disagree with. Read the comments on any of these national articles (I CANNOT BELIEVE I AM ACTUALLY SUGGESTING THIS) and people legitimately think in their actual hearts and souls that brady and belichick are cheaters.
They didnt read the report, they barely even listened to the talking heads. They just were spoonfed guilty and thats that. My own brother who is smart and an independent thinker has been texting me that he is so surprised Brady was into all that etc etc... literally everyone in my ENTIRE workplace from the uneducated up to all the physicians think that they are guilty (I live away from the NE)...
Thats is the saddest part of this. unless there is an internal whistleblower from the NFL, a mind-blowing leak, or the NFL gets so thoroughly embarrassed by a neutral arbitrator such as a court so as to retract the Wells report or something - Brady is forever guilty in most peoples eyes.
I think where Wells may have messed up is he said that he only stated "more probable than not" that Brady was guilty because that was the League standard, but he really thinks Brady is guilty.
The League has that standard to protect themselves against lawsuits. That is why they didn't want Wells to say he is guilty in that report. Now that Wells said that he only used that phrase because that was what the League wanted, it may give Brady and his camp more ammo.
only thing Iam wondering about is if tom is 100% innocent why hasnt he come out and go nuclear yet with his and his family name being dragged through the mud ? Why hide behind lawyer speak when you have nothing to hide?
Thats why I think we need to temper our excitement down. Maybe some lawyers here can put more objective opinions here.Yeah most will praise his tone and find it believable and convincing...somehow.
Just watch. I'm gazing at headlines on the top of our page. "Wells hammers back at Yee and critics". They'll think he did a great job.
only thing Iam wondering about is if tom is 100% innocent why hasnt he come out and go nuclear yet with his and his family name being dragged through the mud ? Why hide behind lawyer speak when you have nothing to hide?
only thing Iam wondering about is if tom is 100% innocent why hasnt he come out and go nuclear yet with his and his family name being dragged through the mud ? Why hide behind lawyer speak when you have nothing to hide?
True. But you are a lawyer. It signifies something if they are tying to rush to close the session. That's all.
It doesn't matter what the average idiot thinks. It only matters what Yee does with it.Yeah most will praise his tone and find it believable and convincing...somehow.
Just watch. I'm gazing at headlines on the top of our page. "Wells hammers back at Yee and critics". They'll think he did a great job.
maybe we are seeing through our pats fans eyes..people elsewhere e.g reddit think wells nailed in the presser and no way even an independent arbitrator reduces the suspension.
I understand that but if you are totally accused absolutely nothing then there is no case to build. Just come out and put your points across, no ?I'm hoping and praying he is putting together an absolutely watertight case, and that its just taking time.
Definitely a massive mistake. They are showing "look, we didn't understand the science, but we based our conclusion on the science", i.e. our conclusion is nonsense.. a.
i think the biggest mistake they made was reisner say it didn't matter which pump was used. clearly they do not understand science.
Shutting down the call quickly is ... well, it's not exactly transparent or fully cooperative.