Ted Wells' Train Wreck Press conference :D

[tigerjohn]

I hope someone asks about the gauges and why they assumed Anderson was wrong in which gauge he claimed he used.

 

[RelocatedPatFan]

Eh, if you become well-known as a hired gun with no regard for the truth, your ability to credibly spin stuff goes in the toilet in a hurry.

Guess Americans and Exponent haven't figured that out yet...

 

[karguy85]

Christopher Price ‏@cpriceNFL 10s10 seconds ago
Wells: If I had access to Brady's electronic messages, it might have yielded additional insights into what happened.

Insights into what happened? Yet he already said earlier in the conference call if he was on a jury he would have marked the case against Brady "proven." How is that not contradictory? What else does he need to prove through Brady's phone records if he is so positive (caveat: I don't believe he proved anything).

 

[Wax Frog]

 

[SVN]

I hope yee has some credible stuff to fight this. He has done good PR but if it turns out he gave brady bad advice I would be might pissed.

 

[Fixit]

If Brady/Kraft really, really want to, they can absolutely ruin Wells.

 

[Kdo5]

*Eagerly awaiting Don Yee's rebuttal*

 

[SVN]

And why hold a sudden presser without allowing reporters time to come up with questions?

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Add thin-skinned and sensitive to a list of flaws that already includes dishonest, conniving, scummy.

 

[BradyFTW!]

If Brady/Kraft really, really want to, they can absolutely ruin Wells.

I can't imagine why they wouldn't want to. And even if they didn't, ruining Wells should be a byproduct of their assault on the league anyway.

 

[Fencer]

So in a nutshell:

• Wells said "Give me the incriminating texts".
• Yee, speaking for Brady, said "There aren't any to give".
• Wells said "He didn't cooperate! Off with his head!!"

 

[Dr Pain]

Ted is convincing

 

[reneluar]

Bruce Allen ‏@bruceallen 2 minHace 2 minutos

Ted Wells doesn't know how text messages work, apparently. They appear on both ends.

 

[SVN]

Tom E. Curran ‏@tomecurran 1m1 minute ago
Wells associate Loren Reisner (sp)?) "Differences in pressure drops found to be signifcant regardless of which gauge used."

 

[Ice_Ice_Brady]

Tom E. Curran ‏@tomecurran 34s35 seconds ago
"Disappointing on one hand to say they are cooperating and then on other (refuse to share) most fruitful area of evidence is inconsistent"

The most fruitful area of evidence has nothing to do with the footballs, you know, not being tampered with.

 

[Rob0729]

Wells associate Loren Reisner (sp)?) "Differences in pressure drops found to be signifcant regardless of which gauge used."

https://twitter.com/tomecurran/status/598191891243474944

Except according to one gauge, it was within the ideal gas laws AND Wells did not trust Anderson on which gauge he used so how can he trust Anderson about the pregame PSI?

 

[JMC00]

Just a flat out lie

@tomecurran
Wells associate Loren Reisner (sp)?) "Differences in pressure drops found to be signifcant regardless of which gauge used."

They weren't significant if you wouldn't have just flat out ignored the science in the sham of a report.

@MarkDanielsPJ
Wells associate Lorin Reisner came on the call and basically said it didn't matter what gauge was used pregame

What bullsh*t. Why? Beause the gauge that Anderson said he used would have put the puts in the range when the balls were measured at HT.

 

[SVN]

Bruce Allen ‏@bruceallen 43s43 seconds ago
I still can't get over a guy with significant ties to the NFL whining that someone would question his independence.

 

[ViperGTS]

Tom E. Curran ‏@tomecurran 34s35 seconds ago
"Disappointing on one hand to say they are cooperating and then on other (refuse to share) most fruitful area of evidence is inconsistent"

Most fruitful area? What the hell. The footballs weren't enough? So the cell phone was the most fruitful. What a joke.

 

[Fixit]

Tom E. Curran ‏@tomecurran 1m1 minute ago
Wells associate Loren Reisner (sp)?) "Differences in pressure drops found to be signifcant regardless of which gauge used."

Uh ... translation?