- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,681
- Reaction score
- 23,359
Why do you guys get so upset at a columnist opinion piece?
Who's upset?
It's called an observation.
OK, I'll play your game: "Why are you so angry about this thread?"
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why do you guys get so upset at a columnist opinion piece?
Agreed, he's just another smug little twerp who never accomplished anything. Do all these idiots in the media around here just parrot everything everyone else says? I just would love to go somewhere like, I don't know, Detroit, or Minnesota, just too see if they have the same amount of arrogant mediots.
So now that the Seahawks win, it's "why can't the Patriots be like them"? Last year it was the Ravens, but they suck now, so no more like the Ravens. The Patriots problems are drafting crappy players like Tavon Wilson, Jake Bequette, and Ras-I Dowling with their high picks, not building their team a certain way.
Carroll was recruiting a lot of those guys since their high school days. That's not luck, that's have preexisting knowledge of the players that were coming out.
So patriots can't hire or acquire this knowledge? Those players must have been scouted extensively by lots of people. Why aren't the pats talking to them if it's so easy?
Pats screwed up many drafts. Seattle drafts Kam Chancellor, pats draft that slow guy whose name I forgot. Utterly forgettable player, not my fault.
Who's upset?
It's called an observation.
OK, I'll play your game: "Why are you so angry about this thread?"
So patriots can't hire or acquire this knowledge? Those players must have been scouted extensively by lots of people. Why aren't the pats talking to them if it's so easy?
Pats screwed up many drafts. Seattle drafts Kam Chancellor, pats draft that slow guy whose name I forgot. Utterly forgettable player, not my fault.
Dowling wasn't a "crappy player." It was a gamble that didn't pay off: the Patriots were gambling that 2010 was an aberration (he played 35 games his first three years), and not the new normal.
The better question in response to the opening post is, when has Gasper done anything notable as a writer or reporter (or radio/TV talking head)? Did he ever break a big story as a reporter? Did he establish himself as someone such as Mike Reiss and Tom Curran did who worked the beat (any beat, Patriots, Celtics, Red Sox, Bruins, or something else) day in and day out and established great credibility for his opinions based on his evident network of contacts? Has he ever impressed you as someone whose different perspective translates to some take that you didn't and probably wouldn't have thought of?
My answer to all of this is, obviously, no. I don't see much insight or much talent with him. What I see is nothing more than the same old phony contrarian act we've seen for decades among the Boston sports media. The next time he tells me something I didn't know will be the first time. I don't think he has the ability to do it, which is why his critique of the Pat's team-building strategy is worthless.
The better question in response to the opening post is, when has Gasper done anything notable as a writer or reporter (or radio/TV talking head)? Did he ever break a big story as a reporter? Did he establish himself as someone such as Mike Reiss and Tom Curran did who worked the beat (any beat, Patriots, Celtics, Red Sox, Bruins, or something else) day in and day out and established great credibility for his opinions based on his evident network of contacts? Has he ever impressed you as someone whose different perspective translates to some take that you didn't and probably wouldn't have thought of?
My answer to all of this is, obviously, no. I don't see much insight or much talent with him. What I see is nothing more than the same old phony contrarian act we've seen for decades among the Boston sports media. The next time he tells me something I didn't know will be the first time. I don't think he has the ability to do it, which is why his critique of the Pat's team-building strategy is worthless.
Actually he was the Patriots beat writer from 2006-2009 with Mike Reiss
How many of the Patriots Super Bowl wins have been because of the bottom of the roster?
A quick perusal brings back 0 of 3.
Randall Gay, starting SB CB say's high
Gasper hasn't been here all that long, Shmessy. Reiss worked his way up the ladder from Patriots Football Weekly and smaller dailies to the Globe gig and honed his craft. Gasper is still green and his writing shows an emphasis of style over substance, same as his radio/television presence. He's black and glib and those things have worked in his favor, but I can't see how he truly has earned where he is now.I disagree. I thought Gasper did an excellent job as a reporter - then football beat writer - for the Globe after Reiss left. Did he fill Reiss' shoes? No - - but Reiss is the platinum standard.
That's quite a leap of conjecture. I was a newspaper reporter for 17 years and never heard/saw anything like that happening with columnists.This is why today's column is so sad - - Gasper obviously knows better and he is being told by his employer to publish what he knows is incorrect in order to receive a paycheck.
No, it just doesn't work that way. Gasper is trying to fashion himself as a "media personality." I don't know if you get the radio/television feeds from here but that much is readily obvious. Being black has helped him immensely. He talks a good game, he just isn't that "mature" as an insightful journalist.Once they moved him to "columnist" it is as if the editors told him to do the WWE Cartoon Villain act that Shaughnessy does. Where it is sad is that Shaughnessy does it from ignorance. Gasper is doing it from coercion. It's 2014 - newspapers (and their employees)are desperately trying to survive.
Carroll was recruiting a lot of those guys since their high school days. That's not luck, that's have preexisting knowledge of the players that were coming out.
Everybody talks about going out and making a splash for free agency, but that doesn't guarantee a Super Bowl win and it puts far more pressure on winning quickly.
All you have to do is look at the Jets, Redskins, Bills, Dolphins, and any other team that got aggressive in free agency in recent years and never even got to a Super Bowl (some don't even get into the playoffs).
Come on it happens every time any Boston writer or media member says anything negative or has a different opinion. It is always same thread "why is this writer so stupid".
I am not angry I just find it funny that on a message board full of different opinions people get upset and angry with a writer doing the same thing.