- Joined
- Jul 21, 2007
- Messages
- 28,161
- Reaction score
- 7,435
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Individual just told me Pats were interested in dealing for Larry Fitzgerald last offseason. And this person I believe without reservation
Like Curran but I put this with.
1) TB will not start the season due to knee problem and "I have been told this". How did that workout?
2) Cassel will not be franchised due to spygate and union will get involved. How did that workout?
3) "Everyone I talked to told me there is no way Moss is being traded". I flip on espn breaking news Moss to Vikings. How did that workout?
Why do you keep spruiking this despite no evidence to support it?He may be available this offseason. The Cardinals insist they aren't going to keep him at his current number, and Fitzgerald insists he isn't going to restructure.
We'll see....
I'm not arguing with you when it comes to swallowing whole.Story floated out by Belichick's toady and swallowed whole.
Tom Curran just tweeted
"Right. Which is why I didn't indicate it got as far as talks. Rt. “@RapSheet: @brian_mcintyre @tomecurran First Cards have heard of this.”
I gave Curran as much crap as anyone for the Brady article, but what he did was reported the worst case scenario and made it sound like it was a strong possibility. Whether that is how he was given the information as if it was a realistic possibility or he just made it sound that way, I don't know.
The Patriots will never have Larry Fitzgerald.
I repeat:
The Patriots will never have Larry Fitzgerald.