FCB02062
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 11,676
- Reaction score
- 10,932
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You think the Patriots are so stupid that they blame the 5'9" receiver for not being able to carry a team when the 6'6" 265 TE isn't playing and opponents can focus on beating the hell out of the little guy? I'm not sure you understand the definition of "weakness".
As for Brady, he was clearly not happy that Welker wasn't brought back, so I'm not sure why you'd bring him into this.
It was perfectly catchable. Look where Wes's hands were when the ball hit him, he dropped the pass. Star receivers make those catches. Brady put it where he could catch it and welker dropped the ball. Just like he did against the ravens.
Do you see the Titanic-sized hole in your logic, here?
It was perfectly catchable. Look where Wes's hands were when the ball hit him, he dropped the pass. Star receivers make those catches. Brady put it where he could catch it and welker dropped the ball. Just like he did against the ravens.
You expect your star receiver to make that catch, especially in the Super Bowl of all places.
Despite a below par throw by Brady, SuperBowl winning WRs make that catch and others in the playoffs. Losing teams' WRs don't make that play. Look at the Pats SB wins. Critical plays made while critical mistakes made by the enemy. Margin of victory is very small. The difference between a very good WR or any other player's performance and a critical play making player is greatness, the difference between no ring and a ring. We've seen it both ways. BB has decided it was a post season problem and is trying to fix it. Just hope he didn't make it worse. Me, I'm excited about 2013.
I was an imperfect pass but also perfectly catchable. Welker just dropped the ball.
You expect your star receiver to make that catch, especially in the Super Bowl of all places.
In fairness, while you expect your "star receiver" to make that catch, you also expect your 1st ballot HoF and greatest of all time QB to throw a more catchable ball
It's on both of them in my opinion. Bad throw resulting in a difficult yet makeable catch.
Even if he doesn't work out, you don't have to look very far to see what all the guys the Pats are bringing in have in common: they're all big, physical targets. Belichick has clearly made the determination that the Pats absolutely need this element in their offense, and he's going to keep aggressively looking until he finds it. Hopefully it's sooner rather than later, but just knowing that it's finally a real priority is encouraging in its own right.
Exactly.
In fairness to Brady he could not risk throwing inside where Welker was expecting the ball. Phillips (21) was closing and too close for comfort to risk the INT.
How many rings did he clock when he was here?
I know what weakness is...
Why do people fall back on such a stupid argument?
How many rings does Brady have since David Patten left?
That must mean that David Patten made Tom Brady.
TFB certainly was to be faulted for some of the blame...I do agree. It wasn't all Weklah's fault. The defense wasn't that good either. It was a collective problem. No doubt.
I just don't see the benefit of having Weklah here though. BB seen it the same way.
Time to move on and have a fresh start.
But, you didn't answer the question...
Great last name ... maybe it inspires him to a long career like Mark's.