Your attempts to again deflect attention from the fact that you have YET to support your claims certainly aren't unsuccessful through lack of trying. I never denied that I stated that Brady's skills declined in 2006. You won't have to "look back through 245 responses" to get that quote because I STATED IT in my last response to you.
However, the claim which you made that you still haven't provided a "scintilla of evidence" for is: "My favorite part is when he clearly implies something and then replies to a post saying "where did I say that?". Please do provide the post/quote to support such a claim or admit to the obvious - that you're a liar. I'll stop rubbing your nose in it then.
A tip - don't use words for which you don't know the meaning. Makes you look less like a fool and saves me the trouble of going "huh" when I read your senseless statements.
Actually, you did provide Brady's stats - I'm afraid I missed it before. Odd, that you provided the stats that showed Bulger's better career numbers and then asked "what better career numbers". LOL - that was quite funny.
Hmm....not only do you have problems understanding basic english but you also have difficulty grasping simple numbers. The 6.8 referred to his NUMBER OF YARDS PER ATTEMPT in 2006 vs 7.8, his average in 2005. Your stupidity really has no boundary.... Anyway - back to the topic. As the numbers that you found for yourself clearly demonstrated....Brady's performance DECLINED in 2006, just as I've stated. So, please, do show me how I have not "provided one scintilla of evidence" to support my statement.
Actually, Brady's decline was quite noticeable in the rankings:
QB rating - 3 spots ; AYP - 9 spots ; Pct. - 5 spots ; ToYds - 6 spots
Such a decline may not be disturbing to you (and the more you "talk", the more I understand why) but that doesn't change the REALITY of that decline.
What relevance does Brady's prior performances have to my statement that he declined, except to use as a baseline? I didn't comment on the nature of Brady's PRIOR performances except to note that his 2006 performance represented a DECLINE from those prior performances. The fact that he had good years in 2004 & 2005 doesn't change the fact that he played poorly in 2006. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?
Well, I'd actually "know" because of the fact that it has occurred throughout NFL history...it wouldn't require "objective, thought based analysis"
Again....what does this have to do with my factual statement that Brady's performance declined in 2006? You can continue to point to Brady's prior performances or assume that he will improve next year but the FACT remains that his performance DECLINED in 2006. So again, please demonstrate how my statement about Brady's decline is incorrect.
Keep trying. This, in itself is rather bland but your increasingly desperate attempts are rather amusing.