- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 17,872
- Reaction score
- 8,913
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.My position is a simple one; it's easier to win a game with an offense that averages 30.2 points and 424 yards of offense per game. This is generally why I refer to the D as a complimentary unit with potential for improvement.
And don't correct me, I chose my words with purpose.
That's exactly what it is. I have absolutely no idea how to construct a sentence, an argument or the application of the words I wish to use in them. Thank you for telling me you know what I'm thinking.Well you misused masquerading. Something masquerades. You don't masquerade something by hiding it behind something else.
Of course its easier to win with a good offense, who is arguing with that?
But if you look at the portions of games where the game is competitive, the defense has played well 9 times and poorly 3.
The cumulative statistics and yardage stats are WORSE because of the offense that averages 30 points and 400 yards. And those cumulative stats and yardage allowed are the argument that is being made which is exposed by the OP.
For the record, I don't consider the Patriots D any worse than the Packers or Saints either. These teams are all built in almost the same way, dominant Offense playing with a complimentary Defense capitalizing on turnovers.
That's exactly what it is. I have absolutely no idea how to construct a sentence, an argument or the application of the words I wish to use in them. Thank you for telling me you know what I'm thinking.
Unbelievable.
Despite being told twice that you're wrong you still insist you're right. Good luck with that balanced approach.I'm sorry that you misused a word. But you did.
Despite being told twice that you're wrong you still insist you're right. Good luck with that balanced approach.
. No one will think less of you to admit than they do of you to be wrong and act like you are right.
It's hilarious that he's been told three times that he's wrong yet he still insists that I'm at fault for using a word (when I know exactly what it means and applied it in the manner that I intended) that provides the key to the balanced defense review codswallop. Furthermore, it's clear he doesn't know what masquerade means and has gone into a self defense tirade after having his balanced defense assessment discredited given the application of his opinion and the Patriots win-loss record as the defensive fact.Words to live by.
Nice contribution. Do you have anything to add that isn't adolescent level?
I can't because you are never wrong..anything i say will be wrong so why add anything to your threads when you are right and everyone else is wrong.
That is totally incorrect. I read every response to my posts, and respond exactly to their comments.You won't listen to anyone anyways.
No, its call a discussion. I make a comment, you reply. If I agree or disagree with your reply, I respond. You possessing an opinion means I consider it, but does not mean it is convincing. Please show me a convincing opinion you have made that I dismissed.Not going to waste my time thinking of a response because you will come back with....not true...as usual
If I create a thread I am stating my opinion, after a lot of consideration. If someone posts an opposing point of view, I respond. I suppose you have a long track record of having an opinion and flip flopping when someone disagrees?I will just point out how you are never wrong in the threads you make..that's all. No need to get mad homeslice
I am certain I am wrong a lot. But if it is an opinion that is not well supported, I wouldn't be arguing it to begin with. In a case such as this thread it is all fact based. In a case of football discussion that involves prediction, everyone is wrong as often as they are right, but you do not know that until after the debate is long over and the results are known.It's okay. You can be wrong. it's human nature. You just have to admit it sometimes which is your problem but you will get the hang of it.
It's hilarious that he's been told three times that he's wrong yet he still insists that I'm at fault for using a word (when I know exactly what it means and applied it in the manner that I intended) that provides the key to the balanced defense review codswallop. Furthermore, it's clear he doesn't know what masquerade means and has gone into a self defense tirade after having his balanced defense assessment discredited given the application of his opinion and the Patriots win-loss record as the defensive fact.
Simple, stubborn folk... God bless them.
It's hilarious that he's been told three times that he's wrong yet he still insists that I'm at fault for using a word (when I know exactly what it means and applied it in the manner that I intended) that provides the key to the balanced defense review codswallop. Furthermore, it's clear he doesn't know what masquerade means and has gone into a self defense tirade after having his balanced defense assessment discredited given the application of his opinion and the Patriots win-loss record as the defensive fact.
Simple, stubborn folk... God bless them.
In what way did I apply the win/loss record as a defensive fact?
That is a total misrepresentation, and you know it.
I broke down game by game the defenses contribution to the outcome. Whether the defense played well enough in that game to deserve to win or lose.
Are you telling me there is a better way to rate what a defense has contributed to the team than its contribution to winning or losing?
Of course it is nice to see that you hold to your form and throw in the obligatory, classless, unprovoked personal attacks.
If you give a convincing counter argument that I am wrong, I will change my opinion. If all you add is bs like that, what would prompt me to reconsider?
Can anyone on this forum ever remember Andy admitting that he was wrong about anything?
Can anyone on this forum ever remember Andy admitting that he was wrong about anything?
Wonder which series of downs Andy will throw out this game to support his OP that the Pats Pass D is AWESOME..
Add Grossman to the list of assassins