PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

OT: Ryan fined for half-time at Patriots game thing


Status
Not open for further replies.
Excuse me gentlemen, but I beg to differ.
While I agree that the fine situation has gone crazy (control freak - Gronk $7,500 for spiking on a TD - please!)
It wasn't for spiking the football, it was for spiking it in the face of an opponent. The simple fact of the matter is that things like that, which easily can lead to brawls, are going to get fined so that they never get out of control. You can spike, you can celebrate, you can jump into the stands. What you cannot do is taunt or get in the face of the opponent, use props in your celebration, or engage in any sort of pre-choreographed maneuvers. So we won't be seeing a return of the "Fun Bunch" anytime soon.
I feel that Rexy deserves to be fined excessively because he is a perpetual, bombastic, bafoon,
Enjoys sticking his foot in his mouth a little too much for my taste & he's uglier than my bulldogs behind.
Let the record show that this recent fine for Rex was not a first offense.
 
Wrecks should be fined more often, like weekly. Either that or handcuff Tony Dungy to him. Give Dungy a riding crop to whack Wrecks in the face every time he utters the "F" word. On game day he'd get 50 lashes.
 
Well the support of my thesis relies on more than just the popularity of the league. Basketball is popular (not as popular as football but certainly moreso than hockey) but that doesn't make David Stern a good commissioner.

Goodell is a good commissioner because he has taken a popular product, continues to expand it, the ratings keep getting better and better, it is becoming more and more of a year-round force in the sports world, it's generating record amounts of revenue and as commissioner, Goodell contributed to the effort to save the league from Tagliabue's disastrous CBA by helping to install a new one with nary a single game missed (oh except the HOF game, whoever was playing in it this year).

And where's the evidence that he is as bad as people say? The only thing someone put forth was saying he is a bad commissioner because he didn't fine Harbaugh or Schwartz for yelling at each other after shaking hands. Pretty pathetic retort.

I think that the differences in opinions can be surmised two ways: short-term versus long-term gains; and from a financial profit-and-loss perspective versus the viewpoint of a fan of the sport itself.
 
And where's the evidence that he is as bad as people say? The only thing someone put forth was saying he is a bad commissioner because he didn't fine Harbaugh or Schwartz for yelling at each other after shaking hands. Pretty pathetic retort.

You defy description....here, you unbelievable crybaby....let's start with the LA Times a few years ago...

The Good, the Bad, and the Goodell | Bleacher Report

here's an article from S.I. talking about Goodell and the league's handling of former players such as Dave Duerson....

Dave Duerson report, Roger Goodell booed in a bad week for NFL - Ann Killion - SI.com

a short excerpt...
The tragic findings in the Duerson case are just the latest blow to the league, which has had months of public relations disasters: from Super Bowl tickets without seats to Goodell's absurd Chicken Little rendering of Judge Susan Nelson's ruling against the league in an Op-Ed in The Wall Street Journal last week.

The Pittsburgh Steelers certainly have a shed full of axes to grind with Goodell...

Do bad feelings about Goodell motivate Steelers? - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Of course the recent Suh issue with Goodell once again illustrates his shoddy management techniques....

Detroit Lions' Ndamukong Suh had little to gain by meeting with commissioner Roger Goodell | MLive.com
First of all, there is no way Goodell sat with Suh, watching penalty after penalty, and admitted the league was wrong.

Goodell is a guy who always talks about protecting the shield. This is the same commissioner who suspended Terrelle Pryor for something he did in college, but did not step in to suspend former Ohio State coach Jim Tressel when he accepted a job with the Indianapolis Colts.

Instead, the team disciplined Tressel.

This is the same commissioner who refuses to admit that reviewing every touchdown slows the game. Goodell acknowledges this is a bad economy, but will not lift blackouts in markets that struggle to sell out their stadiums. The NFL plays games in London, but does not have a team in Los Angeles.

Fighting with Goodell is a waste of time.


Once again, a scathing indictment of Goodell written up in the LA Times....

Why Roger Goodell is Bad as Hell for the NFL | Bleacher Report

Note that I have yet to make even ONE New England/Goodell reference....I can go on ad infinitum into what remains of the night but what's the point?...obviously you are smitten with Goodell like a 16 year old girl is with Mark Sanchez.
 
i don't think he should be fined but


i love roger goodell

best commish ever
 
You see, my noting that you're an expert when it comes to ignorance is nothing more than confirmation that I have been around enough to read a lot of your posts.

Anyone know if Best Buy is going to have a Black Friday special on irony detectors? Mine just f&%$#@! melted.
 
Thought I read a post saying something to the effect of F#$%kfaceDELL being responsible for the success and well being of the nfl.:rofl::rofl:

Roger Gotoohell!!!
 
Last edited:
RG wants an 18 game season, yet he pretends to care about players health. All the rules they make are made to favor the offense. Also, the head hunting rules only apply to defensive players. When an offensive player uses his head to initiate contact there is never a flag or a fine. The NFL was the most popular sport in the USA BEFORE RG took over. It did not become that during his time. He has done a great job at making the league money, but that does not mean the games are better, or that he has improved the league overall.
 
That's about $5800 per letter in the phrase he used...:bricks:
 
The best part is he is getting fined for his responce to "Belichick is a better coach than you"....

So to sum it up, BB hands Ryan his hat in the game, puts the Jets into a tailspin which results in another lost to Jean Shorts Jesus, and now, Ryan is out $75,000! I judge my daily work on wither or not I "ruined someone's day", by that standard, BB really stuck it to Rex..
 
Wait guys, according to half the posters here the commish is a Jet, shouldn't they be getting compensatory picks in the coming draft for this? I'm so confused. Everyone here is so sure that he's a Jet.


Oh, wait ...he's a Colt. ...or was he a Pat? I can never get this right. Changes every weekend.

No, He is a J-E-S-Ter, through and through.

Otherwise he would have punished the Jets for "Blockingate" with the forfeit of a draft pick. It was an organized attempt to alter the game by patently illegal ways on the coaching staff, just like and worse than Spygate.

Wrecks will be fined 2/5ths the fine that Bud Adams was fined for doing the same thing. Plus Wrecks effort was the Second not the First Offense.
That is blatant favoritism.

I applaud Goodells' attempt to address head injuries, and to remove use of the helmet as a weapon, but it is obvious that the correct solution involves removing the hard plastic shell, or burying it some softer material.

In regard to the orange shoes. I would much rather he issue a a requirement that hair be not visible outside the helmet. How you wear it or comply is not the issue. The players can pin it up or cut it.

There is no need for the players to look like Gorillas. That hardly adds to the League image, and can lead to serious injury. If a horse collar tackle is illegal because it is dangerous, then potentially breaking a player's neck pulling on or tackling by his hair, is dangerous, too. Witness the TD saving tackle of a WR by his hair, just this weekend.

Any Coach would get all kinds of grief if he insisted on it, but the Commissioner could and ought to do it.
 
No, He is a J-E-S-Ter, through and through.

Otherwise he would have punished the Jets for "Blockingate" with the forfeit of a draft pick. It was an organized attempt to alter the game by patently illegal ways on the coaching staff, just like and worse than Spygate.

Wrecks will be fined 2/5ths the fine that Bud Adams was fined for doing the same thing. Plus Wrecks effort was the Second not the First Offense.
That is blatant favoritism.

I applaud Goodells' attempt to address head injuries, and to remove use of the helmet as a weapon, but it is obvious that the correct solution involves removing the hard plastic shell, or burying it some softer material.

In regard to the orange shoes. I would much rather he issue a a requirement that hair be not visible outside the helmet. How you wear it or comply is not the issue. The players can pin it up or cut it.


There is no need for the players to look like Gorillas. That hardly adds to the League image, and can lead to serious injury. If a horse collar tackle is illegal because it is dangerous, then potentially breaking a player's neck pulling on or tackling by his hair, is dangerous, too. Witness the TD saving tackle of a WR by his hair, just this weekend.

Any Coach would get all kinds of grief if he insisted on it, but the Commissioner could and ought to do it.

On some players you can't even read their name. The NFL is becoming DREADful.
 
If you're going to jump into a thread, you should probably read the posts leading up to what you're responding to.

I did; I'm quirky like that.
 
I did; I'm quirky like that.

So it was a comprehension issue on your part, where you didn't understand that my post about ignorance was in response to already being called out for alleged ignorance (thus invalidating your "irony" comment), rather than simple ignorance on your part due to a failure to read.


You read. You just don't understand. Got it. You're quirky like that, too. ;)
 
Last edited:
So it was a comprehension issue on your part, where you didn't understand that my post about ignorance was in response to already being called out for alleged ignorance (thus invalidating your "irony" comment), rather than simple ignorance on your part due to a failure to read.

You read. You just don't understand. Got it. You're quirky like that, too. ;)

Nope. My post is my reaction to seeing you call out anyone for ignorance in their posting, seeing as it's your stock-in-trade. I'll have the same reaction any time you do that. Irony: you make it happen.

Now you're going to bleat on and on, proclaim your superiority and amazing Deus-ness, and then eventually try to convince me that you never condescended to read my posts in the first place, because it's beneath you. I've seen it before.

You don't impress anyone. Frankly, neither do I, but I don't pretend otherwise.
 
Can someone lock this stupid thread? It seems all anyone wants to do on most of these threads now is flame each other. This topic sucks anyways. We don't need 500 Jets threads.
 
Thought is was hilarious..shouldnt have been fined but I expected him to be in this new nfl
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Thursday Patriots Notebook 5/2: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 5/1: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo’s Appearance on WEEI On Monday
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/30: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Drake Maye’s Interview on WEEI on Jones & Mego with Arcand
MORSE: Rookie Camp Invitees and Draft Notes
Patriots Get Extension Done with Barmore
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/29: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Back
Top