Bertil
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 1,065
- Reaction score
- 257
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You know what . thats a great point. i would feel a lot better if we had a back up with some exp.is that so? im sorry...but which QB beat SD today? which one beat Indy?
and which one ALMOST beat the Jets?
yea...thats what i thought
You sound strikingly like another team's fan who's happy that your team now has an advantage not because it has the skills and strategy to beat the Pats, but because it can now compete with the Pats equally due purely to injury. Most Pats fans hope that all other teams stay healthy, since we want a level playing field and no excuses when the best team wins. Have fun with this post, as you've obviously been waiting for something like this for a long time. You're a fraud, I'm out.How many games in the past 7 years have the Pats squeaked by because of number 12? Sure, we had the nasty defense in 03 and 04, but Brady made plays and throws that no other quarterback could make. Brady was the x-factor. Everyone here minus a few have pointed out that we had an advantage over most other, if not all teams, just having Brady on the field and his ability to make the unthinkable throw. Cassel could be decent, but that's all he'll be. Even if he exceeds expectations, he's not even at Brees/Big Ben/Favre/Peyton level, which is what would be needed, and even then, we're looking at 2 of the biggest postseason chokers of all time in Favre and Peyton. Unless someone makes a flux-capacitor and we kidnap Montana circa 88, it's not the same. It's like drinking Bud Light after having Bass Ale for years.
Don't get me wrong, I'll watch the games, but we've taken for granted that we have the Joe Montana of the 21st century quarterbacking our team.
Btw, it's all right if you say I'm not a die-hard, because a die-hard would watch every snap with excitement even if Rex Grossman was the quarterback, but I'm a fan of greatness. I can only imagine what it was like to watch Larry Bird play in his prime. We went 9-7 in 2002 and I still watched and rooted for them. I just like watching Brady play. Since the last Super Bowl, this team has turned into the post-2001 Yankees. Like Jeter always says, "This isn't the same team." And this is what it would be like if the Yankees lost Jeter, and I hate the Yankees, but I can imagine how Yankee fans would feel. It's bad enough you aren't winning championships, then the key component to a potential championship goes down.
No matter how you want to spin it or what you've done in the past, there's only 1 word for this: bandwagoner...
I'll admit, I'm spoiled. I didn't think like this even after the first Super Bowl, but something happened in 2003. Seeing a "perfect" team, not record-wise, but when everything comes together, great quarterback play, great defense etc., I expected nothing but championships out of the Patriots, and Brady and the defense were the two main reasons. The defense hasn't been the same since Super Bowl 39 and is regressing, but it's still been good enough to get us to the promised land, and Brady just gets better. With a regressing defense and sub-par/mediocre/slightly above average quarterback play, I know the Patriots aren't winning the Super Bowl. Just like Boomer Esiason said before the game "As long as Tom Brady is the quarterback, the Patriots are Super Bowl contenders every year." The NFL isn't like basketball where it takes having 3 hall of famers or future hall of famers (Bird, McHale, Parish...Pierce, Garnett, Allen obviously) to win championships. I suppose you can go the "dumb-luck and tight defense" route i.e. Ravens in 00, Tampa Bay in 02. I wouldn't count on dumb-luck, and this defense isn't that kind of defense or the Pats of 03/04.
I'm sorry but have you forgotten 2001. I can't be the only one seeing parallels to that. I doubt Cassel will become a Brady but Brady wasn't BRADY in 2001 either.