bruinator
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 741
- Reaction score
- 208
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Could some of you college football watchers compare him to someone in the NFL, please. How good is he? Is he as good as Peterson? I am not a college football watcher so I would appreciate your opinions.
Your thoughts?
Could some of you college football watchers compare him to someone in the NFL, please. How good is he? Is he as good as Peterson? I am not a college football watcher so I would appreciate your opinions.
Your thoughts?
Could some of you college football watchers compare him to someone in the NFL, please. How good is he? Is he as good as Peterson? I am not a college football watcher so I would appreciate your opinions.
Your thoughts?
If he is on the board when this pick comes up, we grab him! No doubt in my mind. As it stands today, Miami takes a QB and then it is our pick and we grab this sick RB who is highly highly ranked. A rare find. If we lose the spot and get the 4th or 5th pick and McFadden is off the board, we trade the pick.
If he is on the board when this pick comes up, we grab him! No doubt in my mind. As it stands today, Miami takes a QB and then it is our pick and we grab this sick RB who is highly highly ranked. A rare find. If we lose the spot and get the 4th or 5th pick and McFadden is off the board, we trade the pick.
And then he gets hurt and we've got tens of millions sunk into a mediocre RB. Ki-Jana who? Cadillac who? Every Bears RB drafted in the last 15 years?
RBs just aren't worth it with a high first. They're probably not worth it with a first in general.
And then he gets hurt and we've got tens of millions sunk into a mediocre RB. Ki-Jana who? Cadillac who? Every Bears RB drafted in the last 15 years?
RBs just aren't worth it with a high first. They're probably not worth it with a first in general.
he is 2nd on his team in yards per carry, and the other guy has over 100 carries and 1,000 yards.
the hype of McFadden is >>>>>>> McFadden
If he's on the board when the Pats pick, they trade the pick for a first and a third this year and a third next year.
RBs don't provide value if their contracts are high and saddle the team for the length of their ridiculously high contracts by preventing the acquisition of multiple players of skill and value.
If he's on the board when the Pats pick, they trade the pick for a first and a third this year and a third next year.
RBs don't provide value if their contracts are high and saddle the team for the length of their ridiculously high contracts by preventing the acquisition of multiple players of skill and value.
If he is on the board when this pick comes up, we grab him! No doubt in my mind. As it stands today, Miami takes a QB and then it is our pick and we grab this sick RB who is highly highly ranked. A rare find. If we lose the spot and get the 4th or 5th pick and McFadden is off the board, we trade the pick.
If we magically transplanted our upcoming draft situation backwards in time 2 years, you would have been saying the exact same things about Reggie Bush. Bush has been good, but the only "great" connected to him is his marketing. Why would you have a reasonable expectation that McFadden would be any different?
And if you take it backwards in time 1 year and draft Peterson you have one of the best RB in football.
If he's on the board when the Pats pick, they trade him for 2 1st rounders THIS year
Problem with that is there isn't 2 1st round draft picks worth 2600 points for the 2nd pick in the draft this year.
And if you take it backwards in time 1 year and draft Peterson you have one of the best RB in football.