If the league can find a way to punish the Pats, they will. The proof: Revisiting excerpts from the Executive Vice President Clown of Football Operations Troy Vincent's statement on Deflategate:
"In determining that a violation occurred, we applied the standard of proof stated in the Integrity of the Game Policy: namely, preponderance of the evidence, meaning that 'as a whole, the fact sought to be proved is
more probable than not.' This is a well-recognized legal standard, which is applied in courts and workplaces every day throughout the country.
"Here, there are several factors that merit strong consideration in assessing discipline. The first is the
club's prior record. In 2007 the club and several individuals were sanctioned for videotaping signals of opposing defensive coaches in violation of the Constitution and Bylaws. Under the Integrity of the Game Policy, this prior violation of competitive rules was properly considered in determining the discipline in this case.
"As you know, we regard violations of competitive rules as significant and deserving of a strong sanction, both to
punish the actual violation and to deter misconduct in the future.
"In accepting the findings of the report, we note that the report identified
no evidence of wrongdoing or knowledge of wrongdoing on the part of any member of the coaching staff, including
Head Coach Bill Belichick,
"Nonetheless, it remains a fundamental principle that
the club is responsible for the actions of club employees. This principle has been applied to many prior cases. Thus, while no discipline should or will be imposed personally on any owner or executive at the
Patriots, discipline is appropriately imposed on the club."