Harvin is too small to play in the NFL,
Are you on drugs?
He's 5'11 195. Probably 2/3 of the WR in the NFL are 5'10-6'0, 190-200.
Last edited:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Harvin is too small to play in the NFL,
Yeah, if he falls to round 6 or 7. Trading up to 51 for him is crazy.I got panned for having the Pats trade up from 58 to 51 to get Harvin when he fell in my last mock, and was a bit surprised byt he board reaction. Harvin has issues, but he is clearly one of the pre-eminent playmakers in the draft. I wouldn't go for him at 34 because there are too many other areas to address, but I do think that if he fell he could have value.
Would you take Percy Harvin at 34 if he is on the board?
I assume you haven't seen the report on ESPN that Harvin failed the drug test at the combine for marijuana?
I wouldn't touch Harvin with a ten foot pole. PacMan Version 2.0Would you take Percy Harvin at 34 if he is on the board?
I wouldn't touch Harvin with a ten foot pole. PacMan Version 2.0
Bill usually focuses on situational football. Odd he forgot to coach this kid up on laying off the weed through the combine... He starts his career off in the pee in a cup program. If he didn't have the capacity or discipline to mind his business pre combine he's an increased risk to not have that capacity pre season. The next time he gets caught he misses a game. Time after that it's 4.
Football matters is Bill's motto. Language can preclude your losing bonus $$$, it can't refund the opportunity lost to get value in the form of a talented player to whom football matters. Some team with seemingly desperate need and standards rationalized accordingly will take him on.
If Harvin is available at #23, YES. He'll be the BPA at the spot for us.
Would you take Percy Harvin at 34 if he is on the board?
No way we take Percy Harvin at #23, he probably won't even go in the 1st rd. I can't see BB taking him at #34 either, even with all his talent and potential.
Why wouldn't we? He'd be perfect in our system. If BB's got him rated high and he's available, it'd be foolish not to pick him. We should pick BPA with our 23rd pick. And BB has always pointed out that that's what he does.