Welcome to PatsFans.com

What is your guess for Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by PatsFans.com Article, Feb 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PatsFans.com Article

    PatsFans.com Article Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl
    By: John Morgan

    Who will the inactives be for the Super Bowl? Here are the most likely candidates as we await kickoff....

    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2012
  2. Elijah

    Elijah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +60 / 9 / -3

    #11 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    No way Cannon and Ridley are inactive.
  3. Mack Herron

    Mack Herron Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,971
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +70 / 0 / -2

    #24 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    Mallet
    Vereen
    Thomas
    Guyton
    Brace
    McDonald
    Jones
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  4. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,851
    Likes Received:
    90
    Ratings:
    +151 / 3 / -19

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    He lists 11 players, only need 8.
  5. FortressX

    FortressX Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #87 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    I don't like this thread title.
    All speculation and will be confused with the real inactive thread that will come later.
  6. A.C Vegas

    A.C Vegas Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    the fact that he put the DL they just brought up to the roster tells me he is jsut throwing it at the wall and see what sticks
  7. tatepatsfan

    tatepatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    850
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    This is an incredibly misleading title. I thought it was going to be the actual list.

    Also, you only need 7.
  8. scout

    scout Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,699
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +35 / 0 / -1

    #15 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    Mods? Drop the snack tray and fix this post please.
  9. AndyJohnson

    AndyJohnson PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    22,115
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +252 / 13 / -8

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    My guess.
    Mallett
    Vereen
    Faulk
    Thomas
    Jones
    McDonald
    Guyton
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  10. Ron Sellers

    Ron Sellers Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    Double-check your fingers and toes. Also, 53 minus 46 equals seven inactives for every game, not eight.

    The column lists twelve possibilities, with a guess for which seven


    For the record these were the inactives for the Ravens game:
    WR Chad Ochocinco
    RB Stevan Ridley
    RB Shane Vereen
    OT Sebastian Vollmer
    LB Gary Guyton
    OL Donald Thomas
    QB Ryan Mallett


    The article says Mallett, Thomas, Vereen and Guyton are automatic; I don't think there's any arguing that. The other three are anybody's guess from the rest of those listed. I'm going to guess Brace, McDonald and one of Ridley, Faulk or Polite.
  11. BlueThunder

    BlueThunder PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    Re: Pats Inactives for the Super Bowl

    Looks about right to me :rocker:
  12. MP-Logick

    MP-Logick Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Sad for K. Faulk, personally. No real surprises here though.
  13. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,008
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +98 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Ridley in.

    HOld on tight kid.
  14. Elijah

    Elijah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +60 / 9 / -3

    #11 Jersey

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Oh my god it's Troy Brown all over again...
  15. blackglass3

    blackglass3 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,782
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +20 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Wow, don't like that at all.
  16. robertweathers

    robertweathers Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,630
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Two things stand out.

    No Brace means that they feel confident that they can stop the run with what they have,

    Ridley being active. I said it earlier in the week and I just might be right in believing that the Pats are going to run the ball over 35 times today.
  17. SVN

    SVN Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,550
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    exactly my first thought :( ...not a good omen
  18. Fixit

    Fixit Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    15
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Am I missing something? Faulk is a shell of his former self. I love the guy, but Ridley's a much bigger threat. JUST HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL.
  19. BoTown

    BoTown Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,586
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Love Faulk and sad we likely have seen him play his last game, but it's the right move. He's too slow at this point in his career and would be a longshot to see the field. Here's hoping we send him out right tonight.
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2012
  20. JackBauer

    JackBauer On the Roster

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    15,645
    Likes Received:
    161
    Ratings:
    +297 / 6 / -5

    Re: Patriots inactives: no Faulk

    Don't like what?
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>