ForThoseAboutToRock
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,123
- Reaction score
- 1,769
Why doesn't the report mention that the four Colts' balls both had mostly also fallen below spec, and also did not lose as much pressure as science would suggest?
Wells' conclusion is essentially: "Science says X amount of pressure loss should occur. The Pats experienced >X, the Colts experienced <X. The Pats probably tampered, don't worry about the Colts."
From my reading of Wells thus far:
PREGAME:
All balls verified by Walt Anderson to be within range. Patriots target 12.5-12.6 psi, Colts more like 12.9-13.1
HALFTIME:
All 12 N.E. balls were measured below 12.5 psi. 11 of them were measured (twice each) with the 2 gauges that Walt Anderson had with him, one of which he used pre-game (the one left out was apparently the interception ball). That table is in this thread already, and has been tweeted. The Colts' balls were lower, but did not drop below 12.5, and did not drop as much as the Patriots'... 4 of the Colts' balls were measured to reach this conclusion. The Patriots balls were reinflated and returned to the game just afer the start of the 3rd Q.
POSTGAME:
4 Patriots balls picked randomly remained above 12.5 after halftime reinflation. 4 Colts balls had deflated or whatever the #'s were.
So at Postgame, there were apples and oranges in terms of comparison - the Colts balls hadn't been reinflated at halftime.