SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The pats has just marched down to the Seattle 10 with lane on the field, not sure how much it really effects their game planIf brady didn't have the first pick, Jeremy Lane won't be out of the game, and the plan changes all over again...
collins and chandler jones missed great chances of wrapping up wilson and he gained many yards after . If they made even one of those tackles , they wouldve had him for a huge loss and ended a drive or two. Seattle only ran 50 odd plays overall.
Was going to say the same thing. Being down by 10 late in the third quarter doesn't spell domination.I would say that the Seahawks made more clutch plays, but the Pats made many more overall good plays. In the end, the Pats needed the biggest play of all to overcome Seattle's big plays and win the game. That's not dominance. That's squeaking by, despite playing much better overall.
Seattle used the Ravens game plan, run and throw jump balls. They happened to hit a few jump balls if they didnt would have been a romp.