- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 21,621
- Reaction score
- 15,806
IMHO, this is the best passing offense since 2007, and it is set through 2016. We need only to re-sign Vereen and Tyms.
mgteich note even close, but what you said was pretty funny.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.IMHO, this is the best passing offense since 2007, and it is set through 2016. We need only to re-sign Vereen and Tyms.
I do think that we will need to see more from Amendola.
2011. O-line is notably absent from your analysis, and the 2011 line of Light-Mankins-Connolly-Waters-Solder was one of the best. Not to mention that this was the apex of the TE Party with Gronk playing the best football of his career and Hernandez doing great. Welker and Brady were in their absolute primes, etc.
While the absence of a downfield WR was notable, it wasn't enough to stop the Pats from steamrolling everyone. That offense was an AFCCG Gronk injury away from dragging a legitimately bad defense to a SB win.
This year's offense may have a higher ceiling if the OL somehow turns into a strength, Gronk gets back to 100%, LaFell keeps up the good work and Wright evolves into a bigger role on the offense, but that's an awful lot of ifs.
Why does that matter at all? Plenty of players have contributed in year 2 after minimal to no contributions as rookie.Please list all the patriots who have ever contributed after spending their rookie year on IR.
Cannon has disappointed me this season I was very high on him and he had a great opportunity to make himself a long term option on our OL and he has not done anything to cease it.I want to understand your position. Is it your belief that none of Wendell, Fleming and Devey are capable of starting at OG in 2015?
We shall see how high a priority Belichick puts on the "need to overhaul both guard positions".
It seems that you have Cannon gone. I tend to agree.
I guess you don't understand. It's not about contributions in the first year. It is about being out of football, injured, for your first year, with no practices with the team. Sometimes a team has enough faith in a top draft choice for it to work. As someone pointed out, Watson was a contributor after sitting out his rookie year.Why does that matter at all? Plenty of players have contributed in year 2 after minimal to no contributions as rookie.
Oh I get it, you think that players do not develop they are what they are from day 1 or never at all, you think Belichick cannot improve or develop any players and he is just wasting money with these players on injured reserve because obviously they suck if they cannot play with a torn meniscus.I guess you don't understand. It's not about contributions in the first year.
Oh I get it, you think that players do not develop they are what they are from day 1 or never at all, you think Belichick cannot improve or develop any players and he is just wasting money with these players on injured reserve because obviously they suck if they cannot play with a torn meniscus.