Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.These stories are as damaging to Goodell as they are to the Pats*. Sorry but you have to be the ultimate blind homer not to admit the smoke you smell is a raging fire of deception by the Patriots, aided by Roger Goodell. The truth is finally coming out.Yeah...complete coincidence I'm sure given the length of this piece too:
http://www.si.com/nfl/2015/09/08/patriots-cheating-suspicions-bill-belichick-tom-brady
Again with the lies: "In September 2007 the Patriots were found to have illegally videotaped Jets coaches during a game, something opposing teams had caught them doing at least twice previously."
No. The Patriots did NOT videotape ILLEGALLY. The taped from the wrong spot. It is still legal to tape the opposing teams' defensive signals.
I have always felt that the deflategate mess was to get BB. No team in the NFL can fathom that the patriots who have had no superstar players other than Brady can be so dominant for 15 yrs compared to the Steelers of the 70s , niners of the 80s and cowboys of the 90s. They have no explanation when they keep signing marquee players, draft superstars but still cant win it all whereas the pats just keep changing teams and winning . So it must be cheating.
It reminds me of the part in the ESPN article where they point out that in one of the AFCCGs against the Steelers, it appeared that the Patriots knew all of the Steelers' defensive signals. And oh by the way, teh Steelers hadn't changed their signals all year, despite having played the Pats earlier that season.
I had to go back and read that again to make sure I got it right. So the Steelers played the Pats twice, the second time 18 weeks into their season, and they were surprised to learn that the Pats knew the defensive signals they'd been using all year? That's just common sense. They'd probably been burned for their ineptitude multiple times already that season, without even realizing it.
This is absolutely what I feel has always been the case with Belichick. He isn't a cheat, he is just smarter than everyone else but sometimes you have miscommunications, which are usually the other guy's fault.One person who knows Belichick well says he does not consider the coach “a cheat.” But he acknowledges that, while others might simply obey a rule, Belichick will search for loopholes and gray areas to exploit—he’ll “study it and take it to the nth degree.
“This guy is two steps ahead of everybody because he is so brilliant. If you’re going to walk the line, every once in a while you’re stepping over. Sometimes somebody has to pull him back in. In his mind, he thinks: I’ll get an advantage and somebody else can figure out if it’s illegal. My job is to coach a football team.”
These storys are we told you to shut up and take the punishment or we were going to leak everything and anything we can about your supposed past transgressions.
OH NOES!!! NOW EVERYONE WILL KNOW ABOUT THE LUKEWARM GATORADE!!!
Trying to figure out signals with the naked eye is legal, and most teams try it. Doing it with video cameras is illegal because a team can rewind the tape and match signals with play calls.Looks like SI needs better fact-checkers. There's nothing illegal about videotaping signals.
I know rosenberg wrote some crap about the pats before too."Teams usually take 53 players to the game and announce, 90 minutes before kickoff, which seven are inactive. But sometimes, at Saturday-night meetings, Belichick tells his staff which players on the opposing team were not on the flight to New England, a source with knowledge of the meetings tells SI. It’s not clear how Belichick knows. But he does."
I usually know too now...damn beat reporters helping teams cheat by putting it on twitter