Welcome to PatsFans.com

Sal Pal: Welker likely active, Wilfork likely inactive

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by pats1, Oct 4, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Just reported on SportsCenter.
     
  2. QB12

    QB12 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +39 / 2 / -6

    #12 Jersey

    As I predicted . . . great news.

    Does Welker take Galloway's roster spot, and does Edelman play where Galloway has been playing?

    QB12
     
  3. BradfordPatsFan

    BradfordPatsFan In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Paul Perrillo reporting the same in regards to Welker.
     
  4. Bertil

    Bertil Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think the late addition of "Andre the Giant" told us a lot about the short term expectations for Vince Wilfork.
     
  5. mayoclinic

    mayoclinic PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,806
    Likes Received:
    731
    Ratings:
    +2,143 / 6 / -6

    Agreed. I would have been very surprised if Wilfork had played, and would have expected it to be in a very limited role, with Sands backing him up.

    Welker back is huge.
     
  6. cthurman79

    cthurman79 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    they need welker big time today!
     
  7. BradfordPatsFan

    BradfordPatsFan In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Welker and Wilfork both active
     
  8. jays52

    jays52 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Messages:
    3,114
    Likes Received:
    184
    Ratings:
    +414 / 1 / -1

    #91 Jersey

    Galloway and Brace amongst the inactives...
     
  9. 52decleetzu

    52decleetzu Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Jesus Belichek leaking out false injury info 3 hours before the game.

    Probably not necessary 3 hours before the game starts.:rolleyes:
     
  10. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    28,104
    Likes Received:
    802
    Ratings:
    +2,507 / 33 / -55

    No Jersey Selected

    Wilfork's not inactive. Sands will probably get the majority of the reps today though.
     
  11. TommyBrady12

    TommyBrady12 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    119
    Ratings:
    +329 / 33 / -23

    #12 Jersey

    looks like the pats are feeding ESPN and Sal Pal wrong info. :D Wilfork is active.
     
  12. weswelker#83

    weswelker#83 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,540
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    The Patriots inactives are linebacker Jerod Mayo, wide receiver Joey Galloway, corner back Terrence Wheatley, running back BenJarvus Green-Ellis, guard Kendall Simmons, defensive tackle Ron Brace, defensive back Bret Lockett, and offensive lineman Rich Ohrnberger.
    It Is What It Is Patriots Inactives Vs. Ravens, 10/4
     
  13. mayoclinic

    mayoclinic PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    13,806
    Likes Received:
    731
    Ratings:
    +2,143 / 6 / -6

    The Sith lord strikes again!

    I expect Wilfork to be very limited today, with Sands getting most of th reps.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>