- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 17,862
- Reaction score
- 8,878
I stopped reading after the bolding comment. There was no application of consistent referring for both sides.I did no 180. As an impartial observer, I saw a game that if called unfairly, it was against both sides. One team was not favored. If the Packers had an edge in penalties, it's much more likely it was because they were more disciplined throughout. Some posters are complaining about uncalled holding calls. Seriously? There's holding on every line engagement. It goes both ways; there were arguable holding calls both ways.
And for you to point out the game sealing INT which was nullified by TBC's hands to the face as a bad call because the offensive lineman was doing it too is quite funny. His was most assuredly a penalty anyways, so the most that would have happened is the penalties would've offset, which achieves the same effect.
And even if the Packers had obvious bias of calls, are you saying they aren't allowed to have a problem with an obvious no-call? A blatantly obvious no-call at that?
Where's my about-face? My stance has been the same.
Packers fans are welcome to complain about the officiating. Fortunately for them they were on the better side of the ledger given the blatant penalties that were committed by their lines they weren't called for.
When one side is penalized the other isn't for exactly the same penalty right in front of the officials you start asking yourself questions. Your failure to recognize that overrules your apparent "impartiality".
Last edited: