NEGoldenAge
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2007
- Messages
- 2,022
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Do people realize the Steelers, Colts or Patriots have been in 10 of the last 11 Super Bowls.
Now, obviously, that has a lot to do with quarterbacking. Especially for the Colts & Pats.
People tend to have opinions deeply ingrained and to look for facts to support their arguments. It's rare to find people that gather the facts and then form their opinion. That's where the "salary cap = must" comes from, because it's simply not true that a salary cap is a necessity for a successful league.
Every year, more and more aging Sox fans die. For many years the number of young replacements has fallen far short. When enough of the old fogies are gone, the Sox are going to crumble under the weight of no salary cap. I hope it happens to all of baseball.
You seriously think ratings would stay at their level if the NFL played 162.
No. Besides being super boring and having no salary cap, the huge number of games is one of the biggest problems with baseball. Mark my words, as the older generation starts wittling down, the Sox are going to collapse. Nothing against the old fogies, I just don't understand why you'd follow such a boring sport.
No. Besides being super boring and having no salary cap, the huge number of games is one of the biggest problems with baseball. Mark my words, as the older generation starts wittling down, the Sox are going to collapse. Nothing against the old fogies, I just don't understand why you'd follow such a boring sport.
More games= more revue. MLB averages over 30K per game.
There are plenty of young people who detest football.
Since you hate baseball, you'd probably never meet any. That's not hard to figure out.
The reality is, it's a lil specious to assume a sport that has grown revenue 430% in the past 15 years is "dying".
Now, how anyone suffers through basketball is the real question.
Every year, more and more aging Sox fans die. For many years the number of young replacements has fallen far short. When enough of the old fogies are gone, the Sox are going to crumble under the weight of no salary cap. I hope it happens to all of baseball.
None of that changes the fact that there are far fewer young baseball fans being produced every year. The fanbase of baseball is aging, and in time teams that are paying out the huge salaries are going to implode.
On the other hand, football is growing ever faster with the young generations and makes every game important.
......and still the Boston Globe thinks we're all just hanging on their in depth reports about Bobby Valentine's favorite diner or Josh Beckett's lucky belt.
Hmm, the Boston Globe? You mean the paper that made THIS its front cover today?
Perhaps we could all use a little reality check on what it means to be "neglected."
Go to Boston.com right now and see the FOUR (yes, 4) separate breathtaking team coverage stories on the crisis of the Wally costume theft/misplacement.
jeezus..."old fogeys","fans over sixty","grandpa's in rocking chairs"....you young guys sure have a lot of contempt for us "old" guys. Don't look now, but something is gaining on YOU every day...and it ain't the train to Disneyworld...the real truth is even us old fogeys have waned in our fandom since the B.O.A Sox decided to market the team to the pink hat posse.I LOVE the Patriots and the way they do business....I cannot stomach the way the Sox have been marketed and refuse to spend a penny on their overpriced ,undersized seating or their Fenway "brick" scams. Hope I feel the same way when I'm 80....:yeeha:
Are you demographer?
Ah, this is the crux of the matter. It's not really about the Patriots being "under-covered," is it? Because they're clearly, objectively not. The Patriots get a HUGE amount of coverage, locally as well as nationally. It's routine during the season to hear about reporters who cover other teams being awed by the vast throng that is the Patriots Beat when New England comes to town. You can count on every training camp practice being reported on in detail by a bunch of different outlets, and every actual game being covered to death.
It seems to me that the complaints are really about the Red Sox getting so much coverage. A lot of Pats fans will never be satisfied with any amount of football coverage unless they get less baseball coverage, too.
Personally, I just skip the baseball stories and enjoy the massive football coverage. It's easy! Here's a hint: you don't have to click on the all-sports home page. Here one link to get you started:
New England Patriots - Football & NFL News, Tickets, Schedule, Stats & Roster - Boston.com
Ah, this is the crux of the matter. It's not really about the Patriots being "under-covered," is it? Because they're clearly, objectively not. The Patriots get a HUGE amount of coverage, locally as well as nationally. It's routine during the season to hear about reporters who cover other teams being awed by the vast throng that is the Patriots Beat when New England comes to town. You can count on every training camp practice being reported on in detail by a bunch of different outlets, and every actual game being covered to death.
It seems to me that the complaints are really about the Red Sox getting so much coverage. A lot of Pats fans will never be satisfied with any amount of football coverage unless they get less baseball coverage, too.
Personally, I just skip the baseball stories and enjoy the massive football coverage. It's easy! Here's a hint: you don't have to click on the all-sports home page. Here one link to get you started:
New England Patriots - Football & NFL News, Tickets, Schedule, Stats & Roster - Boston.com
Patriots announce today's training camp crowd at 13,654. New single-session record. Breaks yesterday's mark.