Patriot Missile
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2005
- Messages
- 14,085
- Reaction score
- 11,101
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Thank, now that was profound.
Hey I get the fact that given the increased use of press man coverage there is a premium on receivers who can create separation through size speed or quickness, and Cooks is one of those guys. But I would counter by saying despite all the our current WR's who supposedly can't do that, we somehow managed almost 600 yds against EXACTLY that style of defense.
It's not that I don't want more guys who can beat man coverage, its the cost, both short term and long, for a improvement that I wonder we will see. For example I would have rather kept those picks and signed Floyd who is receiver who, while quite different from Cooks, can create separation by raw speed and size.
I thought we played most of the best defenses in the league last season and did pretty well. Didn't we have the 2nd best scoring average in the league just slightly behind a historically great offense.
Again how much better will it get. Is this addition going to propel Brady to be better than 14-1? Or 6000 yds, 40 points a game. If the latter is true, then maybe I'll agree with you.
I'm happy you're happy. It's just that I've never had a problem with "freakin' deep-middle"
Hell yes, and some decent NFL experience, too. I think he makes a fine first round choice.Wow, 23 years old. He is so far ahead of the learning curve at such a young age. Didnt realize that he was so young.
I'm just questioning the high price paid for what was not an obvious area of need
Three bits of comfort to those rueing the loss of a first round pick.
1. Think of this trade as drafting John Ross, a similar WR, in the first round. Sure, there's less cost control but the ultimate outcome is similar.
2. Out of the 53 man roster there are a total of four players we drafted in the first round. First round players aren't necessary to building a winning roster.
3. Further to point two, we waived Dominique Easley, traded Chandler Jones and Jamie Collins (not strictly a first rounder but of that talent) last year and still won the SB.
First rounders are very nice to have but with BB moulding this roster, they aren't essential.
Out of the 53 man roster there are a total of four players we drafted in the first round.
Brandin Cooks A Historically Great Receiver At Age 23
Cook's accomplishments through age 23 are almost unmatched in history, even among the all-time receiving greats.
Here are Cook’s career receiving stats:
Brandin Cooks
215 receptions, 2,861 yards, 20 TDs
And here are the receiving stats of the top 15 receivers in NFL history through their age 23 seasons:
Marvin Harrison
0 receptions
Reggie Wayne
27 receptions, 345 yards, 0 TDs
Terrell Owens
35 receptions, 520 yards, 4 TDs
Tim Brown
44 receptions, 733 yards, 5 TDs
Cris Carter
44 receptions, 845 yards, 8 TDs
Henry Ellard
50 receptions, 890 yards, 6 TDs
Jerry Rice
49 receptions, 927 yards, 3 TDs
Steve Smith
64 receptions, 1,026 yards, 3 TDs
Anquan Boldin
101 receptions, 1,377 yards, 8 TDs
James Lofton
100 receptions, 1,786 yards, 10 TDs
Tony Gonzalez (tight end)
168 receptions, 1,838 yards, 15 TDs
Isaac Bruce
140 receptions, 2,053 yards, 16 TDs
Andre Johnson
145 receptions, 2,118 yards, 10 TDs
Larry Fitzgerald
230 receptions, 3,135 yards, 24 TDs
Randy Moss
226 receptions, 4,163 yards, 43 TDs
Of that group, only Larry Fitzgerald and Randy Moss had more receptions, yards and touchdowns. That’s it.
Expanding the group to add some more Hall of Famers who lie outside the top 15 in all-time receiving yards:
Charlie Joyner
35 receptions, 493 yards, 3 TDs
John Stallworth
36 receptions, 692 yards, 5 TDs
Art Monk
58 receptions, 797 yards, 3 TDs
Michael Irvin
58 receptions, 1,032 yards, 7 TDs
Steve Largent
87 receptions, 1,348 yards, 14 TDs
Lance Alworth
71 receptions, 1,431 yards, 14 TDs
Andre Reed
158 receptions, 2,128 yards, 16 TDs
Andre Reed comes the closest to Cooks, but still, none compare.
This is not to suggest that Cooks at age 23 is on a surefire path to the Pro Football Hall of Fame. He merely has quite the head start. And his best years still lie ahead.
I'm not "lamenting" that at all. I'm just questioning the high price paid for what was not an obvious area of need. But I can see why all the Madden/fantasy dweebs are going bonkers over it.
Yeah he's tough. I don't know if he is JE tough though.
you cant defend cooks thats why bb wanted him
Imagining all of the cover-2 to take away Cooks and Hogan outside, leaving a lot of room for Gronk in the middle in single coverage.
:drool:
Regards,
Chris
When did they struggle early? They had a decent opening night, and an outstanding one vs Miami. So I guess you mean they struggled relatively against Houston (another playoff team) with a rookie QB, and obviously vs Buffalo with the rookie QB with the thumb that have surgery the next week. Please.Yes, if you ignore how much the offense struggled early, you can pretend there were no problems. That's not really news, Ken..
I thought I'd have to explain this one better.???
One of Floyd's problems is a struggle to get separation.
The point being the Pats offense was 2nd best in the league against good defenses (especially DL's), as opposed to the general criticism that the Pats D was good against bad offenses. With point being why give up so much draft capital to improve an obvious strength, which was going to get better already with Gronk returning.Yes, so?
Not ridiculous, just working hard to make a point. It is never a bad thing to add a good player. Clearly the crux of our disagreement is how critical is the need that supposedly Brandin Cooks fills. You think it's a serious gap that needs filling. I see him as a nice luxury who could have more value down the road (if they can keep him) I was merely pointing out that the offense was very good in fact the 2nd best in the league even WITH that so called serious gap. And I question just how much better they can be. If they average over 35-40/game, then your point will have been made, less than that and my theory that any gain will be marginal. Hard to improve on 14-1 under Brady.Now you're just being ridiculous. The trade should make a legitimate offensive issue less of an issue. For a team in New England's position, that's a good thing. .
Apparently BB does and I disagree. Does that mean that I can call you homer now because you agree with him. Wouldn't that be an ironic change of positions for us.Apparently, BB has had a problem with it.
then there's gronk! wow!Bye bye Danny Amendola? Edelman, Cooks, Mitchell and Hogan is a potent #1-4 depth chart.
Regards,
Chris