Off The Grid
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 9,153
- Reaction score
- 4,341
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Don't tell me you want double choke to win grossBefore reading it all...How many Jamokes here wrote the Packers off, 17 Points ago??
#RhetoricalQuestion
James Jones is what Lafell was last year? We're talking about the same James Jones that nobody wanted in the offseason vs. a 900 yard wideout? Nope. The Packers have a WR2 and basically the rest are near JAG levels with a subpar OL. Similar to what Brady has had. Actually, one can make an argument that Brady has had more to work with since he can at least throw to a guy who may retire as the GOAT at his position. Rodgers has nothing of the sort but does have a very good RB behind him that has had an off season for his standards.
He's saving that for the game winning TD with :30 left in the gameOh C'mon, no you like that? Should have ran to the crowd and screamed it and thrown the ball to them.
The GB OL is definitely better than NE's.
James Jones 2014 year was not bad considering he had a rookie QB and was on the Raiders.
73 rec/666 yards/6 TDs .... Lafell 74 rec/954 yards/7 TDs
No, it really hasn't been. New England's OL at least has an excuse with rookies on top of injuries. Rodgers has been getting hit at a high clip even though his mobility has afforded him a way to buy more time. That too speaks to how bad the Green Bay WR's not named Cobb and Jones have been. Like I said, he's dealt with the same issue Brady has. Difference is he's dealt with it all season.The GB OL is definitely better than NE's.
James Jones 2014 year was not bad considering he had a rookie QB and was on the Raiders.
73 rec/666 yards/6 TDs .... Lafell 74 rec/954 yards/7 TDs