SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Fencer said:The last paragraph says the Colts aren't great because they only beat bad teams by small margins when they should win by big margins. Would anybody here care to endorse that argument emphatically?
The irony is that everything being said about the Colts is also said about the Pats. I remember us not demolishing too many teams in 2001, 2003, or 2004.Oswlek said:Football outsiders did a study a year ago that showed a far greater correlation between teams that demolish bad teams and winning the SB and teams that win a bunch of close games and winning the SB.
It is probably in the archives if you search for words like guts, skates and stomps. These are the terms they used for different types of wins.
Pujo said:The irony is that everything being said about the Colts is also said about the Pats. I remember us not demolishing too many teams in 2001, 2003, or 2004.
workhorse said:Wait until McNair gets hurt, he always seems to. Remember he is the "ultimate warrior" always playing through injuries. Either that or he is always hurt, living up to the nickname McHurt. But hey, they are 4-1.
...you will anyway, shocking so many of us with you prescience on McNair.workhorse said:I hate to say I told you so, but...
scout said:I still believe the Jaguars will take that division. I will go one step further. There is a very good chance that Indy does not even make the playoffs. They have played the weak part of their schedule and have won (barely). Now, they go against some tough teams that will run them into the ground (besides the next three after their bye). They might be looking at six to seven losses which may not be good enough.