anditsgood
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 6,328
- Reaction score
- 3,571
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Right. Last year's SB team that barely beat practice squads on its way to the SB, and is worse this season, isn't legitimate.
Yet we couldn't beat them. Twice. Not sure where you're going with this stellar logic.
Yes they are good and fun to watch. Tough division though, could see both WCs coming from there if DEN/KC/OAK all split their own games amongst themselves (this would make it harder for any of them to grab the #1 too)What about Oakland? Anyone else thinking we might play them in January this year?
Huh? They beat both Super Bowl teams from last year.They haven't beaten a legitimate team yet.
Huh? They beat both Super Bowl teams from last year.
Concidering the Broncos game was in Denver, gotta give extra props. We all should know by now that's a tough place to play.
It's not a tough place to play in at all if you're healthy.
Right. Last year's SB team that barely beat practice squads on its way to the SB, and is worse this season, isn't legitimate.
Dating back to 2012, the Broncos had won 34 of their last 40 home games going into Sunday. The Pats have won 35 of 41 home games over the same period. We're almost identically good at home, so if Denver's "not a tough place to play in at all if you're healthy", then neither is Foxboro.
Squeaking out wins over teams that are bad and/or decimated by injury doesn't make it a tough place to play.
The last time we took a healthy team there we emasculated them.
Miami early in the season with that heat and humidity is really tough - guys are cramping up left and right. Later in the season due to milder weather, (and maybe improved conditioning on the part of the players) Miami's not as bad.Denver and Miami seem to always be tough for the Pats.