I think you take issue with those who are attempting to put James in that discussion, and rightfully so, but that's not me.
I see a guy who's transformed lousy teams into instant contenders, yet still has flaws. There's no doubting that he's been one of the best players in the league over the past 12-13 years, but I wouldn't attempt to claim that means that he belongs in the all time discussion. Personally, without much thought and after seeing Deus' list for a brief glimpse, Id have him anywhere from 12-18, myself.