SeanBruschi54
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,718
- Reaction score
- 179
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.SeanBruschi54 said:per Bill Belichick....
from his interview...
O'Callaghan should start. Kaczur I see more as a situational guy who can give guys breathers on the line.Brownfan80 said:Cool deal, I guess this shows the other motivation for trading Gorin. O'Callaghan and Kaczur both in the mix at RT, no room for Gorin.
He'll head out there and stretch (like every other day) then he'll probably head into the bubble but not practice with the team.BelichickFan said:Now we need Jackson out there . . .
Pats726 said:But will he?? Seems a bit late at this point..makes OL decisioons a LOT harder...Would have rather he PUPed and recovered more...Am optimistic..and as BB said putting players out earlier is not always the best.
Of Course Kaczur because Britt isn't that good.Oswlek said:Who would you rather go into the season with as the backup OT, Kaczur or Britt? I gotta say Kaczur.
SeanBruschi54 said:Of Course Kaczur because Britt isn't that good.
You clearly have not been at TC and you clearly have not seen games at Cal where he played.PATSNUTme said:I don't believe what I'm reading.
O'Callahan as the starter and Nick as a backup???? O'Callahan has not done anything yet. Wow, he started in a pre-season game.
Nick has been tested last year under very difficult conditions and passed the test vey well.
Sure I like most of what O'Callahan did last week. But, lets not get the 'flavor of the week" confused with the guy who actually did the job during the regular season.
I know he did it at LT, but LT is more difficult and he's a more natural RT.
SeanBruschi54 said:You clearly have not been at TC and you clearly have not seen games at Cal where he played.
If you did you wouldnt say that.
Dont get me wrong Kaczur was great but i dont think he can do as good a job as i think O'Callaghan will. O'Callghan dominated guys every year throughout college.pats1 said:And you obviously didn't watch Kaczur last year.
Thinking O'Callaghan is better suited to start - especially at this point in his career - over Kaczur is crazy.
SeanBruschi54 said:Dont get me wrong Kaczur was great but i dont think he can do as good a job as i think O'Callaghan will. O'Callghan dominated guys every year throughout college.
I guess we'll have to see.
SeanBruschi54 said:You clearly have not been at TC and you clearly have not seen games at Cal where he played.
If you did you wouldnt say that.
DUMB question.....Just because Kaczur is starting to practice does NOT mean he is ready to play or is even close to being in game shape form. If this is a healthy Kaczur READY physically to play it's a no-brainer..but that may NOT be what the choice is. Would you rather have a Kaczur starting the season and rehabbing and NOT ready to play or a healthy Britt who is learning the position..a rook?? (I don't even agree that this may be the choice..but it's one that I was asked about...) A bit different a choice do you not agree?? What if Kaczur isn't really ready to play for a few games..or a month?? I think that is where the decision has to be made. If K can be game time in the first few games, then yes, he should get himself in shape ASAP. If on the other hands there is doubt, why rush him and maybe cause more harm in the long run. If that is the case PUP and have a healthy lineman ready to play Game 1.Oswlek said:Who would you rather go into the season with as the backup OT, Kaczur or Britt? I gotta say Kaczur.
I think a class of remedial reading is in order...where did I say that it was "bad"??? As for twisting things..maybe you don't understand the decision they MAY have to make..between an injured Kacur on the mend who may not be ready for a month and having a healthy player as a backup. THAT is a possibility and a coach they must make. Obvious a lot depends on that gating factor of recovery and how quickly that will happen. If he may not be ready to play for a month or so, he may be better on PUP than and totally healthy when he returns than rushed in quickly. And if he comes in too soon, not only might he be reinjured, but he may not be as effective. Which is better??BelichickFan said:Interesting how some people can twist a Patriot player getting healthy in to a bad thing There is nothing bad about this :rocker: