- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 25,362
- Reaction score
- 10,252
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We're more likely to find a New York reporter who wants to make the Jets look bad. How about Glauber (NewsDay)? He already got a good start on that task today.Felger, but he would only do it if it made the Pats look bad. The odds of him looking into anything or raising any question that might help the Pats is zero. Besides, he went on record last night saying Jets did nothing wrong, Pats cheated. He doesn't need to know the facts, just will it embarrass the Pats or not, and will it get him better ratings.
I don't understand the ruling either, it makes no sence. But there IS also something wrong with that picture of the camera man. He's wearing SHORTS supposidly the taping was done in Nov. or Jan. So when was this taken? It wasn't a late fall or winter game.
OK, I went back and saw the jets logo in the back ground. I thought it was suppose to be of the taping of one of last years Nov,or Jan, games.These photos are from the 1st game of this year. This Jets employee was on the sidelines filming. The press say its ok because he is a Jets media guy but per the rules, it is illegal as he is a Jets employee filming from an unauthorized location. This is the rule the Patriots broke. Filming signals is not illegal, it was the camera location. The rules do not make an exception for team media guys. It is pretty cut and dry.
I dont want to let this go...and I'm damned sure the Patriots will rip the Jets another a-hole...if not for the infectious yeast induced stench that ManGina oozed out about our cameras during game 1...but for this latest blatant infraction the Jets AND the commish has commited. The Jets and the commish are in cahoots.