PromisedLand
Virtual Internet Person
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 3,367
- Reaction score
- 30
That line got me too, for the reason it got you plus this:I was just going to post that. This line really gets me: Because the injuries sustained were not the result of any malicious intent by Mr. Moss, a claim for her damages will be submitted to his insurance company."
If this doesn't prove this b!tch was trying to extort him, I'll sh!t in my hat.
Isn't that just typical slimeball lawyer doublespeak? First he makes a point of denying that his client acknowledges were not intentional, then in his next breath he admits they were not. What a piece of work."There has finally been acknowledgment that the injuries were not intentionally inflicted," Sharpstein said.
An attorney for Washington said "no such acknowledgment exists."
Washington had been acting "solely on the advice of her former attorney" when she filed temporary restraining orders, Darrell Thompson said in a statement.
"She has decided that such restraining order is unnecessary," Thompson said. "Because the injuries sustained were not the result of any malicious intent by Mr. Moss, a claim for her damages will be submitted to his insurance company."