Mack Herron
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 15,111
- Reaction score
- 21,142
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Like I said, I had to laugh at Pats fans with the nerve to moan about calls they claim the Colts and Steelers got (ESPECIALLY Super Bowl XL) because NO team has benefitted from ref charity like New England.
You all laughed and challenged me to give proof -- well there it was Sunday, in the form of the MOST OBVIOUS NON-CALL IN THE HISTORY OF FOOTBALL.
Though I shouldn't even have to name it (being so obvious) let's just say what Vrabel got away with in full view of the refs is BEYOND ridiculous.
You wanted your proof? You got it. Go ahead and argue -- I dare you.
Yes and I acknowledged the fact that some people recognized the truth -- wish you'd read more carefully -- so please, enough with the tired old "troll" ploy. The point was, even those who admitted he got away with it still shrugged it off as nothing -- quite a difference from the way you all reacted when you thought OTHER teams got the ref charity.
The bigger point -- I was challenged here to show proof of my claim that no teams gets calls like the Pats. Well hoot! there it is! For all to see (except the refs for some strange reason) this past Sunday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bplFfY75co
Video evidence to the contrary, my friend.
When I was watching the game, I thought Rivers was under a tremendous amount of pressure. Turns out he wasn't... just that he had Vrabel kicking at his leg that had no ACL in it.
I might be nitpicking, but, it looks to me that that was a tad more than, "sticking his foot out"... and by the by, he did trip Rivers.
The ref saw it, and called nothing, because IT WASNT A PENALTY.
Vrabel was being blocked, went to the ground, and Rivers ran into his legs.
There is absolutely no blatant attempt to trip. Vrabels legs were in the natural position he went to the ground in.
It simply was not a penalty.
Point of clarification -- "trip" and "leg whip" are different things.
At most, this was a tripping foul.
If I had been the R, I would not have called it. Tripping is one of the very few rules left in the NFL rule book that requires a finding of intent. By and large, the NFL has attempted to remove all such rules, with the most notable one being grounding -- that now is based solely on objective criteria.
But leg to leg contact must be intentional to be a foul. No replay I've seen establishes this for me. I would have kept the flag in my pocket.
Now, before anyone jumps all over me for being a homer, I have frequently defended the referrees in this forum when other pats fans go balistic about calls. Triplette was right on top of the play. He has one job right there -- to stay right on top of the QB and call infractions on the QB. He didn't "miss" it. He just didn't call it. Presumption on "intent" fouls is not to call it.
The other thing that you can just never get through to fans is that there is a huge difference between whether one suspects a foul was committed and whether one should call it.
I see play on here. Then again, I didn't see very much worth bellyaching about during the AFC Championship Game last year except the no-contact "faceguard" PI.
Seriously, how many games have you officiated?
Do you have any idea just how amazingly great these guys really are?
I get that we're fans and so it's our job to keep on the refs, but I'd love it if everyone with this opinion could try just one NFL play as the umpire or side judge.
1.) Vrabel had beaten his man yet ended up feet first. How'd that happen?
2.) It was a trip with a leg stuck out as Vrabel was going to the ground, not a leg whip. Since you're 'nitpicking', you'll understand that I disagree with your nitpick
I'm not arguing with you in that he beat his man... beat him like a drum.
Ok, look at the tape again.... he does a spin move and beats the lineman. What action then occurs to put Vrabel on the ground?