- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
So no Jones, no Ayers, and Easley has a knee injury. Is Jake Bequette next man up?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So no Jones, no Ayers, and Easley has a knee injury. Is Jake Bequette next man up?
That would take something like changing my Poland Springs to a fine Cabernet, not to mention a roster move.
I disagree; I think that is a catch a NFL WR can make, especially a $5.7M per season NFL WR. Would it have been a difficult catch, sure, but it was a catchable football, so I do not see anything ridiculous about saying he had a catchable football go off his hands for an interception, because that is what happen.
This response is so obnoxious it's ridiculous. My post said Amendola had a good game although he did have a ball go off his hands and get intercepted. There is absolutely nothing wrong or out of line with me saying that so get lost with you nonsense. I can honestly say I am thoroughly disappointed and pissed off by the childish and cry baby-ish responses to my post.Oh ffs, I watched Julian Edelman drop 4 passes almost in a row just a couple/three games ago. Last I looked, he makes pretty good $$$$, too, and those catches were a lot easier. Give it a rest.
Amendola didn't catch that ball for the same reason Miller didn't knock it down. Think real hard...it'll come to you.
This response is so obnoxious it's ridiculous. My post said Amendola had a good game although he did have a ball go off his hands and get intercepted. There is absolutely nothing wrong or out of line with me saying that so get lost with you nonsense. I can honestly say I am thoroughly disappointed and pissed off by the childish and cry baby-ish responses to my post.
You want to talk about something that needs a rest its you and the others who defend Amendola constantly. He is bad and if you think otherwise your ability to assess NFL talent is bad.
Do not post this **** with one of my posts quoted again. I do not have the time nor the interest in hearing excuses or whiny *****ing. I am above it, to good to be pulled into stupid conversations about bottom of the roster players that so many people failed to assess the talent of.
I do not have the time nor the interest in hearing excuses or whiny *****ing. I am above it, to good to be pulled into stupid conversations about bottom of the roster players that so many people failed to assess the talent of.
This response is so obnoxious it's ridiculous. My post said Amendola had a good game although he did have a ball go off his hands and get intercepted. There is absolutely nothing wrong or out of line with me saying that so get lost with you nonsense. I can honestly say I am thoroughly disappointed and pissed off by the childish and cry baby-ish responses to my post.
You want to talk about something that needs a rest its you and the others who defend Amendola constantly. He is bad and if you think otherwise your ability to assess NFL talent is bad.
Do not post this **** with one of my posts quoted again. I do not have the time nor the interest in hearing excuses or whiny *****ing. I am above it, to good to be pulled into stupid conversations about bottom of the roster players that so many people failed to assess the talent of.
You know, most of the people who post on this board are very reasonable. Perhaps you should consider that if numerous people have an issue with you over and over again, particularly about the same thing that its about you not them.
Perhaps you should consider this instead of continually telling people what you decide they can or cannot post, or acting as if you have a right to allow them to respond to your posts.
You would probably enjoy your experience here much more if you didn't act so threatened by people disagreeing with you, because, honestly, you are a lightning rod for disagreement.
Oooooooo...
The post I quoted perfectly laid out your unending (unhinged) beef and it didn't say what you claim.
You're like the guy who marries multiple times, has no kids, then wails at his bad luck for marrying eight barren women.z
And ps: for a guy who doesn't have the time, you've left and returned to this thread several times already. So, are you taking your ball and going home, but keep forgetting the ball, or what?
It is not a jihad it is an acknowledgement of something that happened. Amendola did have a good game against Denver and he did have a ball that could have been caught go off his hands for an interception. The problem is you and the others are overly sensitive so when I say Amendola you all pounce and overreact with irrational response. I cannot make a basic acknowledgement of an actual play that occurred without this type of overwhelming response. It is really quite sad in fact.I have LIKED and AGREED WITH many of your posts over the last few weeks - go and look at your Alerts list.
I am also SICK of you and your jihad - you can't help yourself and it's pathetic. between the left-handed compliments and the "5.7" comments, you just can't help yourself.
The content of the argument was accurate and correct the content of your argument was incorrect, as was the case for others and despite that it was presented aggressively and issue was taken when it was not agreed with. It destroyed yours and many others creditability because it highlighted that your opinions are based solely on name notoriety and what the team invested in the player. Amendola was a poor signing from day one and I maintained that and you took issue with that and your failure was that you relied on nothing but the fact Amendola was well known and the Patriots invested a lot in him. You were wrong here and if you maintain that mediocre approach to scouting and assessing personnel you will be wrong many more times.
You are also wrong if you believe that football was not catchable.
What nobody cares about is your after the fact attempts to save face when really a person who was as wrong and misdirected as you were on the Amendola subject would be better off standing clear of it rather than inserting yourself into something you've so clearly already failed to assess properly.
I do not have the time nor the interest in hearing excuses or whiny *****ing. I am above it, to good to be pulled into stupid conversations about bottom of the roster players that so many people failed to assess the talent of.
You need to switch to decaf dude.This response is so obnoxious it's ridiculous. My post said Amendola had a good game although he did have a ball go off his hands and get intercepted. There is absolutely nothing wrong or out of line with me saying that so get lost with you nonsense. I can honestly say I am thoroughly disappointed and pissed off by the childish and cry baby-ish responses to my post.
You want to talk about something that needs a rest its you and the others who defend Amendola constantly. He is bad and if you think otherwise your ability to assess NFL talent is bad.
Do not post this **** with one of my posts quoted again. I do not have the time nor the interest in hearing excuses or whiny *****ing. I am above it, to good to be pulled into stupid conversations about bottom of the roster players that so many people failed to assess the talent of.
The problem is I can't take anything you post with much more than a grain of salt because you only appear in conversations when you see an opportunity for confrontation. It is predictable, I know that if I post about Amendola in any way, shape or form, I will almost instantly get tapatalk alerts that you, AJ, 50, and 2-3 others taking issue with what I say. I could open a thread that said today is Danny Amendola's birthday and you and the rest would respond in the context that I was calling Amendola old and washed up. Like I said it is just predictable and expected at this point so when it happens I just think wow are these dudes really that hard up for an Internet argument. To answer my own question yes it appears you dudes are, otherwise this would not be a 10+ page thread filled with worthless **** that just pollutes this board.I sad nothing with regard to whether the pass was catchable. I will repeat the part of your post that I reacted to. It was you that said that what was relevant was that posters thinking that they were right. As I indicated, this is a post that does not deal with the content, and if fact says that content is irrelevant.
"I could careless, my issue was never with Amendola it was always with posters like you thinking you were right when you were clearly wrong."
I was calling Amendola old and washed up.