- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 19,486
- Reaction score
- 21,585
Wouldn't that be the Ravens? Are we really supposed to pretend that this mess of a franchise is the same organization that won all those titles back in the day and the Ravens aren't? That's just silly to me.
That's a different discussion. For me personally it's all about the city. I don't care how much money Bob Irsay paid to keep the name Colts, they still played in Baltimore and Indy is an expansion team.
Here's the breakdown of the top ten winners in NFL history based on years participated;
1) Packers - 13 titles in 95 years - 13.68%
2) Browns - 8 titles in 67 years - 11.94%
3) Baltimore - 5 in 52 years - 9.62%
4) Chicago - 9 in 96 years - 9.38%
5) Cowboys - 5 in 56 years - 8.93%
6) NY Giants - 7 in 91 years - 7.69%
7) Steelers - 6 in 83 years - 7.23%
T8) Pats - 4 in 56 years - 7.14%
T8) 49ers - 5 in 70 years - 7.14%
10) Skins - 5 in 84 years - 5.95%