VrabelJr
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 8,118
- Reaction score
- 7,740
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Well, we could put Gronkowski in there, too, if we were really stupid.Cunningham has been, per play, one of our most effective defenders.
We have to get inside pressure, and there really isn't anyone else on the roster who can do it.
Well, we could put Gronkowski in there, too, if we were really stupid.
Otherwise, I completely agree with you.
This show we need a beefy speed rusher on defense who can line up between the tackles on obvious passing third downs. If Cunningham performs well at this, this will definitely fill a huge need.
It's impressive how much disruption he's been generating considering the little playing time he gets and playing mostly at DT.Cunningham, to go along with his 1 sack, has led the team in drawn defensive holding with 3, which would have led to him getting sacks.
Penalty watch: Cunningham's rise - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
Awesome job so far this year, considering that he couldn't get on the field at all last year.
I am sure you guys saw Cunningham lined up over the Guard Multiply times Sunday Night to no avail. I would like BB the scrap that idea and play Cunningham exclusively at Left LDE/LOLB where he can use his speed against the Tackle or TE's. We saw how Tuck abused Mankins in Two SB's but JC is no Justin Tuck by any stretch of our imagination. Play him where he's effective and not where he's not.