wahwho
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 202
- Reaction score
- 109
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Also, a contract is a two-way street. If you think that Jarvis' 2009 cap number is out of whack, you are in effect criticizing the Patriots front office for agreeing to such a deal.
The question is, is there any way Seymour becomes trade bait THIS offseason and is replaced (at least on paper) by Green?
I'm not rooting for it, just wondering if the idea has any merit.
Wilfork is of course first and teh deal will get done, BECAUSE both he and the team want it to happen.
I don't see the same willingness expressed by Mankins, or by Seymour or even by Gostkowski.
Also, a contract is a two-way street. If you think that Jarvis' 2009 cap number is out of whack, you are in effect criticizing the Patriots front office for agreeing to such a deal.
Wilfork is of course first and teh deal will get done, BECAUSE both he and the team want it to happen.
I don't see the same willingness expressed by Mankins, or by Seymour or even by Gostkowski.
I expect Wilfork to be extended before the draft.
Every thread is a seymour bash who had the same sack total as in 2003 8 and
and put his best career solo tackler and asst numbers....why .seymour had a career year in 08.
also you look at a contract as a whole not in bits and pieces its not a 1 yr deal to ananlysis.
You are correct, his cap # is too high; but did you read Urgent's comment two posts above yours?If the Pats can cut him, they should cut him. That is too high of a price tag for someone that is invisible. Green and McGinest used to be one of those guys that would make that clutch play or timely stop on third down. I didn't even know he played this year.