E1Downey
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 1,588
- Reaction score
- 372
Please, lets get into an argument about semantics.
Everyone just loves having to read the back and forth between two posters arguing about these things.
Is talking about what a single, deranged tweeter said "worse" than the actual tweet?
Maybe not, despite my having literally said otherwise.
The original Tweeter was read by 53 people.
Reporter writes about the Tweeter and quotes him and 53,000 people have now read said Tweet.
Which was more harmful?
And I'm sorry, it is unprofessional to write an article about a single, unknown tweet(er). The writer of this article had an agenda. The Tweeter was just the tool.
Who cares which is worse. Theyre BOTH scumbags. Im sure the two of you can agree on that.
Sent from the device that is held in my hand.