Giants D-line

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Holy Diver, Feb 2, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Pro Bowl Player

    #80 Jersey

    This D-line hype remids me a lot of teh Carolina Super Bowl. The leadup was how effective the Panthers D-line would be against the patchwork O-line for the Patriots. HOw they were the best D line in football, and were going to cause Brady to crumble in fear...

    Brady 32/48 - 354yds - 3 Tds - 1 Int

    Antowain Smith - 26 carries - 83 Yds - 1TD

    2 sacks on Brady
     
  2. Fball

    Fball Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    It's a little strange how everyone is talking about the game like it's the 1st time the Giants have faced the Pats this year.

    They played, and their D-line was okay - nothing amazing, but they were able to muster some stops.
     
  3. D-Money

    D-Money In the Starting Line-Up

    Well the giants d-line is much healthier now.I am just sick of these giant players chirping.Seems like they think the patriots got here by luck.
     
  4. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Pro Bowl Player

    #80 Jersey

    Also:

    Matt Light
    Russ Hochstein
    Dan Koppen
    Joe Andruzzi
    Tom Ashworth

    vs

    Matt Light
    Logan Mankins
    Dan Connolly
    Brian Watters
    Vollmer/Solder
     
  5. CityOfChampions

    CityOfChampions Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    I posted a video yesterday and the Giants pass rush apparently is practically ineffective v.s. a 2 TE set.
     
  6. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact Pro Bowl Player

  7. Raymond

    Raymond Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    No Jersey Selected

    Well, how would they be against a 1.5 TE set?
     
  8. IllegalContact

    IllegalContact Pro Bowl Player

    the one thing the giants have not seen is what they are doing now with hernandez. their LB's suck (kiwanuka is a DE and won't cover harnandez, blackburn is a joke and boley lacks the size)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page