bobbutts
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2007
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 379
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.English translation anyone?
Is the tide starting to turn, or is it my rosey Patriot glasses???
I don't think many of us care that much about the public opinion court... It's the real court we're concerned about.Its this type of commentary that REALLY helps the Pats in the court of public opinion.
Time to dig up some other Wells "investigations". Give hiim the Cosby treatment. ( no disrespect meant to Cosby's victims) enough crap comes out and he will be toast.One biased report is hard to prove. Get another report from the same guy, that apparently has the same problems, jump on in. It gives you more believability. That interview, especially about the "context" in regards to explanations and the information left out of the report has been becoming clearer.
While I have no trouble believing everything he says about Wells, as it's is consistent with what we've all witnessed, even factoring in the likelihood that Wells' report on the Dolphins' bullying scandal was every bit as slanted as his hatchet job on Brady, I have a hard time imagining what could possibly be in the testimony Wells left out that would excuse Turner for what was going on in that locker-room on his watch.
Could you imagine anything even close to that lack of professionalism being tolerated on a Belicheck-run team?
I'm sure that there are other teams in which the inmates are allowed to run the asylum like that, and Turner might indeed have a case against Wells/Goodell for being singled out and made a pariah so the league can pass it off as an isolated incident when it's not.
But that doesn't mean I want a coach who'd let that kind of situation get out of control like that anywhere in the Patriots' organization, and I'd be willing to bet Belicheck wouldn't either.
If I understand you correctly, what happened made Turner unlikeable. So him getting railroaded is not the same as Brady getting railroaded.
I think the underlying logic to that is when the powers that be are allowed to railroad someone, even an unlikeable someone, then everyone is open to railroading for any reason the powers that be 'arbitrarily' decide. To take the logic one step further, those that validated the railroading because it was being done to someone who did things that made him unlikeable, it aided the next person, for example Brady, to get railroaded.
I'm curious regarding Turner's abhorrence. Where did you get your information to form your cemented opinion of him? I assume now that you have seen how Wells/Goodell will twist words and actions to suit what their selling (and do so without honor, fairness or honesty), you are sketpical about anything they said but have more than enough information from other independent sources, for example the many eyewitnesses in the lockerroom, to say he is abhorrent regardless of those "investigating" and "providing the most information" on him being scummy?