So you would use our 3rd in the trade with one of the 2nd's. If the right players are there, I like that idea.
I think using our 3rd to trade up is a definite possibility. According to the "old" draft value charts, 89 + 58 gets us to around 43, 89 + 47 gets us to around 33, and 89 + 34 gets us to around 26. All possibilities. The top 50 looks really good in this draft.
I could also see us trading back from #23. My specific trading partner would be the Giants, because they have #29 and #45, which is pretty much equal in value to #23 and 58. If the Giants want to move up to secure someone (say, one of the big WRs like Heyward-Bey and Nicks, since Miami at 25/Baltimore at 26/Indy at 27 are all possibilities) and we don't see much difference between 23 and 29, then it's quite possible.
We could do both. We could end up with:
#26 (trading up from #34 plus #89)
#29 (trading down from #23 with the Giants)
#45 (trading up from #58 with the Giants)
#47
Or:
#29 (trading down from #23 with the Giants)
#33 (trading up from #47 with #89)
#34
#45 (trading up from #58 with the Giants)
In my "best case scenario", we might be able to get Beatty at 29 and Barwin at 33, and some combination of Sean Smith, Louis Delmas, Jarron Gilbert, or Robert Ayers at 34 and 45.