How much did that "ruin" Barnicle? He laughed all the way to Imus, MSNBC and the bank (not necessarily in that order).
He'll be known as "Ron Forges" for life!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.How much did that "ruin" Barnicle? He laughed all the way to Imus, MSNBC and the bank (not necessarily in that order).
2. How hard will his union fight this? My guess... tooth and nail.
My own thoughts on the subject:
I write for a newspaper and every sportswriter I've talked to today has said the same thing: "That's what a notes column is!"
Read the notes column on a given Sunday around NFL cities and you will see many of the same stories with a small change in verbage thrown in here or there.
That's the same thing that Borges did... heck, even Michael Felger (we assume) defended him.
The statement at the bottom of the column IS the disclaimer.
Hate him if you want. Be glad he's gone.
But he's not a plagiarist.
That leads to two questions:
1. Why is The Boston Globe suspending him (a bone to Pats' fans, some other performance issue)?
2. How hard will his union fight this? My guess... tooth and nail.
At any rate, as someone in the business (who reads weekly notes columns from all over for a radio show), this isn't plagiarism. Borges didn't try to pass off someone else's work as his own. The line at the bottom of the column makes that clear.
Why are you even using the name RonBorges as a username, are you looking for attention? Why are you trying to pass yourself off as borges?At any rate, as someone in the business (who reads weekly notes columns from all over for a radio show), this isn't plagiarism. Borges didn't try to pass off someone else's work as his own. The line at the bottom of the column makes that clear.
Yeah, his nonexistent union will be fighting this one tooth and nail. Who's ever heard of a sportswriter union?
My own thoughts on the subject:
I write for a newspaper and every sportswriter I've talked to today has said the same thing: "That's what a notes column is!"
At any rate, as someone in the business (who reads weekly notes columns from all over for a radio show), this isn't plagiarism. Borges didn't try to pass off someone else's work as his own. The line at the bottom of the column makes that clear.
It's called the Newspaper Guild and is a closed shop (I believe) at the Globe. It does have clout with management.
A guild is different than a union. Guilds don't have reps and aren't an entity unto themselves, they're just bands of people in a similar profession who are capable of demanding higher wages by threatening strike. They would be able to pressure management to rescind, but its unlikely they'd be able to fund legal action. Borges himself is more than wealthy enough to do so, however, but I don't believe there's any case.
No, that's the name of the union, not a description. The Newspaper Guild IS a national union that negotiates contracts for individual chapter units. They most assuredly will represent Borges vs. the Globe in this case. It all depends on what evidence management comes up with to justify termination, and no doubt they had to make sure they were within contractual specifications for suspending him.
But he's not a plagiarist.
That leads to two questions:
1. Why is The Boston Globe suspending him (a bone to Pats' fans, some other performance issue)?
2. How hard will his union fight this? My guess... tooth and nail.
The Guild will provide legal representation, if Borges decides to contest his suspension. That's one of the benefits of the dues he pays. If he's wise, he won't contest his punishment, because his chances of winning won't be good.
It's interesting that this episode may result in improved sports reporting all over the country. This "notes" business isn't good. The problem is not that the information is published in several newspapers. After all, AP stories are published verbatim in hundreds of papers. The problem is that it's a misuse of the byline.
Sports writers are judged by their writing skills, their insights and the information they provide--their ability to establish sources on the inside. In his plagiarized notes, Borges demonstrated none of that.
My own thoughts on the subject:
I write for a newspaper and every sportswriter I've talked to today has said the same thing: "That's what a notes column is!"
Read the notes column on a given Sunday around NFL cities and you will see many of the same stories with a small change in verbage thrown in here or there.
That's the same thing that Borges did... heck, even Michael Felger (we assume) defended him.
The statement at the bottom of the column IS the disclaimer.
Hate him if you want. Be glad he's gone.
But he's not a plagiarist.
That leads to two questions:
1. Why is The Boston Globe suspending him (a bone to Pats' fans, some other performance issue)?
2. How hard will his union fight this? My guess... tooth and nail.
At any rate, as someone in the business (who reads weekly notes columns from all over for a radio show), this isn't plagiarism. Borges didn't try to pass off someone else's work as his own. The line at the bottom of the column makes that clear.
In this town Ron Borges will forever be known as a fraud, period. I know he is a talented writer, but the writing is on the wall in this town for him now. I don't think he needs to lose his livelihood over what he did but, but in this town he's finished. He could try Seattle maybe...or not.
He was there before...so he could return to his thug past....Maybe Oakland since he's such a big raiders fan. How funny would that be if his columns are all praise about Al Davis...