- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 49,635
- Reaction score
- 28,362
A 1st 2 years down the road is roughly equivalent to a 2nd 1 year down the road. So 2nd vs. 3rd... really not an enormous difference there, for 4 more games for a guy they use the franchise tag on.
I am going to respond and be done and allow you the last word. We are talking the Raiders, it was a good gamble that the pick would be top 5 if not #1 overall. The Vikes pick is destined to be mid to late in the round. That is a lot of picks differents.
I really don't, I just understand how to separate what I KNOW from what other people are TELLING me I should believe.
And I really don't have a bias against the guy either. Don't like him, but other than the one game last year I never criticized the guy.
I never once dissed the trade, but thanks for telling me that I hated it...
I have always maintained that BB will always have much more information than me and I trust his decision to at the very least be UNDERSTANDABLE (if I had all the information). I am 100% confident that BB does what he -believes- is in the best interest of the team short term AND LONG term.
However just like the 2009 defense didn't get better by trading Seymour, the 2010 offense isn't getting better by trading Moss. Although with Brady leading the way and all the extra talent, I still feel confident that the team can compete just fine.
The Pats traded Seymour for potentially a franchise player since they were most likely confident they were getting a top 5 to 10 pick most likely with a salary cap. There still is a major difference.
Patten, Vrabel, Seau, Bruschi... BB will not sacrifice the team's goals for a player but he sure as hell isn't the cold hearted emotionless robot that you want him to be.
Vrabel was traded away for virtually nothing just to save giving him a million dollar roster bonus. He is a prime example of Belichick making a cold hard decision. Vrabel was worth an $1 million bonus to him.
Patten was brought in to be a tutor for Tate and Price and it looks like he was asked to retire after he did nothing (he decided to retire without even talking to his wife about it which tells me that Belichick told him he was going to be cut, but he would let him retire gracefully). Seau and Bruschi cost nothing and were veteran leaders. It wasn't like he gave them big deals and until each retired, they did start or at least play significant roles on the defense.
The Moss deal was a difficult decision according to BB. If the Lions were making the exact offer I think the scale tips in favor of BB declining. Since it were the Vikings I think it HELPED the scale tip the other way. Never said it was even a MAJOR factor in the decision. Why do you feel that BB doesn't suffer from the same human condition as the rest of the world?
Anyway, let's get away from a minor detail that is moot since by all accounts the Vikings are the only team that were offering anything and this wasn't a case of the Patriots shopping Moss around to the league. Why didn't BB use the Vikes offer as leverage to shop Moss around the league for a potentially better deal.
I can almost guarantee you if the Lions offered a third, Belichick wouldn't have had a problem trading Randy to them. The Vikings were desperate for a deep threat for Brett and they were most likely offering the most if not the only one offering anything.